← Strabo

Geography

§13.1.54-13.1.56

Fate of Aristotle's Library and Scepsian Scholars

The passage details the remarkable journey of Aristotle's and Theophrastus's libraries from Scepsis to Rome through Neleus, alongside other prominent Scepsians like Demetrius and Metrodorus, and the unique metalworking of nearby Andeira.

View ▾
View
Translation
Typeface
AI ↗
← PrevNext →
§13.1.54

ἐκ δὲ τῆς Σκήψεως οἵ τε Σωκρατικοὶ γεγόνασιν Ἔραστος καὶ Κορίσκος καὶ ὁ τοῦ Κορίσκου υἱὸς Νηλεύς, ἀνὴρ καὶ Ἀριστοτέλους ἠκροαμένος καὶ Θεοφράστου, διαδεδεγμένος δὲ τὴν βιβλιοθήκην τοῦ Θεοφράστου, ἐν ᾗ ἦν καὶ ἡ τοῦ Ἀριστοτέλους· ὁ γοῦν Ἀριστοτέλης τὴν ἑαυτοῦ Θεοφράστῳ παρέδωκεν, ᾧπερ καὶ τὴν σχολὴν ἀπέλιπε, πρῶτος ὧν ἴσμεν συναγαγὼν βιβλία1 καὶ διδάξας τοὺς ἐν Αἰγύπτῳ βασιλέας βιβλιοθήκης σύνταξιν. Θεόφραστος δὲ Νηλεῖ παρέδωκεν· ὁ δʼ εἰς Σκῆψιν κομίσας τοῖς μετʼ αὐτὸν παρέδωκεν, ἰδιώταις ἀνθρώποις, οἳ κατάκλειστα εἶχον τὰ βιβλία οὐδʼ ἐπιμελῶς κείμενα· ἐπειδὴ δὲ ᾔσθοντο τὴν σπουδὴν τῶν Ἀτταλικῶν βασιλέων ὑφʼ οἷς ἦν ἡ πόλις, ζητούντων βιβλία εἰς τὴν κατασκευὴν τῆς ἐν Περγάμῳ βιβλιοθήκης, κατὰ γῆς ἔκρυψαν ἐν διώρυγί τινι· ὑπὸ δὲ νοτίας καὶ σητῶν κακωθέντα ὀψέ ποτε ἀπέδοντο οἱ ἀπὸ τοῦ γένους Ἀπελλικῶντι τῷ Τηίῳ πολλῶν ἀργυρίων τά τε Ἀριστοτέλους καὶ τὰ τοῦ Θεοφράστου βιβλία· ἦν δὲ ὁ Ἀπελλικῶν φιλόβιβλος μᾶλλον ἢ φιλόσοφος· διὸ καὶ ζητῶν ἐπανόρθωσιν τῶν διαβρωμάτων εἰς ἀντίγραφα καινὰ μετήνεγκε τὴν γραφὴν ἀναπληρῶν οὐκ εὖ, καὶ ἐξέδωκεν ἁμαρτάδων πλήρη τὰ βιβλία. συνέβη δὲ τοῖς ἐκ τῶν περιπάτων τοῖς μὲν πάλαι τοῖς μετὰ Θεόφραστον οὐκ ἔχουσιν ὅλως τὰ βιβλία πλὴν ὀλίγων, καὶ μάλιστα τῶν ἐξωτερικῶν, μηδὲν ἔχειν φιλοσοφεῖν πραγματικῶς,2 ἀλλὰ θέσεις ληκυθίζειν· τοῖς δʼ ὕστερον, ἀφʼ οὗ τὰ βιβλία ταῦτα προῆλθεν, ἄμεινον μὲν ἐκείνων φιλοσοφεῖν καὶ ἀριστοτελίζειν, ἀναγκάζεσθαι μέντοι τὰ πολλὰ εἰκότα λέγειν διὰ τὸ πλῆθος τῶν ἁμαρτιῶν. πολὺ δὲ εἰς τοῦτο καὶ ἡ Ῥώμη προσελάβετο· εὐθὺς γὰρ μετὰ τὴν Ἀπελλικῶντος τελευτὴν Σύλλας ἦρε τὴν Ἀπελλικῶντος βιβλιοθήκην ὁ τὰς Ἀθήνας ἑλών, δεῦρο δὲ κομισθεῖσαν Τυραννίων τε ὁ γραμματικὸς διεχειρίσατο φιλαριστοτέλης ὤν, θεραπεύσας τὸν ἐπὶ τῆς βιβλιοθήκης, καὶ βιβλιοπῶλαί τινες γραφεῦσι φαύλοις χρώμενοι καὶ οὐκ ἀντιβάλλοντες, ὅπερ καὶ ἐπὶ τῶν ἄλλων συμβαίνει τῶν εἰς πρᾶσιν γραφομένων βιβλίων καὶ ἐνθάδε καὶ ἐν Ἀλεξανδρείᾳ. περὶ μὲν οὖν τούτων ἀπόχρη.

​From Scepsis came the Socratic philosophers Erastus and Coriscus, and Neleus the son of Coriscus, a man who had also heard Aristotle and Theophrastus, and succeeded to the library of Theophrastus, in which was also that of Aristotle. For Aristotle indeed delivered his own to Theophrastus, to whom he also left his school, being the first we know of to collect books and to teach the kings in Egypt the organization of a library. Theophrastus delivered it to Neleus; and he, having conveyed it to Scepsis, delivered it to those after him, ordinary men, who kept the books locked up and not even carefully stored. But when they perceived the eagerness of the Attalid kings under whom the city was, who were searching for books for the construction of the library in Pergamum, they hid them under the ground in a certain trench. Having been damaged by dampness and moths, long after, the descendants of the family sold the books of Aristotle and Theophrastus to Apellicon of Teos for a great deal of money. Now Apellicon was a lover of books rather than a philosopher; wherefore, seeking a restoration of the eaten parts, he transferred the writing into new copies, filling up [the gaps] not well, and published the books full of errors. And it happened to the older Peripatetics after Theophrastus, because they did not possess the books at all except for a few, and especially the exoteric ones, that they had nothing to philosophize about systematically, but only to declaim on commonplaces; while to those of later times, from the time when these books came out, it was possible indeed to philosophize and Aristotelianize better than those, but they were forced to say what was for the most part only probable, because of the multitude of errors. And Rome also contributed much to this; for immediately after the death of Apellicon, Sulla, who had captured Athens, carried off the library of Apellicon, and when it was brought here, Tyrannion the grammarian, being a lover of Aristotle, managed it, having courted the one in charge of the library, and certain booksellers used bad scribes and did not collate, which also happens in the case of other books written for sale both here and in Alexandria. Concerning these things, then, let it suffice.

§13.1.55

ἐκ δὲ τῆς Σκήψεως καὶ ὁ Δημήτριος ἔστιν οὗ μεμνήμεθα πολλάκις, ὁ τὸν Τρωικὸν διάκοσμον ἐξηγησάμενος γραμματικός, κατὰ τὸν αὐτὸν χρόνον γεγονὼς Κράτητι καὶ Ἀριστάρχῳ· καὶ μετὰ τοῦτον Μητρόδωρος, ἀνὴρ ἐκ τοῦ φιλοσόφου μεταβεβληκὼς ἐπὶ τὸν πολιτικὸν βίον καὶ ῥητορεύων τὸ πλέον ἐν τοῖς συγγράμμασιν· ἐχρήσατο δὲ φράσεώς τινι χαρακτῆρι καινῷ καὶ κατεπλήξατο πολλούς· διὰ δὲ τὴν δόξαν ἐν Χαλκηδόνι γάμου λαμπροῦ πένης ὢν ἔτυχε καὶ ἐχρημάτιζε Χαλκηδόνιος· Μιθριδάτην δὲ θεραπεύσας τὸν Εὐπάτορα συναπῆρεν εἰς τὸν Πόντον ἐκείνῳ μετὰ τῆς γυναικὸς καὶ ἐτιμήθη διαφερόντως, ταχθεὶς ἐπὶ τῆς δικαιοδοσίας, ἀφʼ ἧς οὐκ ἦν τῷ κριθέντι ἀναβολὴ τῆς δίκης ἐπὶ τὸν βασιλέα.3 οὐ μέντοι διηυτύχησεν, ἀλλʼ ἐμπεσὼν εἰς ἔχθραν ἀδικωτέρων ἀνθρώπων ἀπέστη τοῦ βασιλέως κατὰ τὴν πρὸς Τιγράνην τὸν Ἀρμένιον πρεσβείαν· ὁ δʼ ἄκοντα ἀνέπεμψεν αὐτὸν τῷ Εὐπάτορι, φεύγοντι ἤδη τὴν προγονικήν, κατὰ δὲ τὴν ὁδὸν κατέστρεψε τὸν βίον εἴθʼ ὑπὸ τοῦ βασιλέως εἴθʼ ὑπὸ νόσου· λέγεται γὰρ ἀμφότερα. περὶ μὲν τῶν Σκηψίων ταῦτα.

​And from Scepsis is also Demetrius, whom we mention often, the grammarian who explained “The Trojan Battle-order,” having lived at the same time as Crates and Aristarchus. And after him, Metrodorus, a man who had changed from the life of a philosopher to the political life, and wrote rhetorically for the most part in his treatises. He used a certain novel style of phrasing and astonished many. On account of his reputation, although he was poor, he obtained a brilliant marriage in Chalcedon and made his fortune as a Chalcedonian. And having courted Mithridates Eupator, he set sail with him to Pontus together with his wife, and was honored exceptionally, being appointed over the jurisdiction from which there was no appeal of the case to the king for the person judged. He did not, however, continue to be fortunate, but having fallen into enmity with more unjust men, he revolted from the king during the embassy to Tigranes the Armenian. But Tigranes sent him back, against his will, to Eupator, who was already fleeing from his ancestral domain, and on the way he ended his life, either by the hand of the king or by disease; for both are said. Concerning the Scepsians, then, let this suffice.

§13.1.56

μετὰ δὲ Σκῆψιν Ἄνδειρα καὶ Πιονίαι καὶ ἡ Γαργαρίς. ἔστι δὲ λίθος περὶ τὰ Ἄνδειρα, ὃς καιόμενος σίδηρος γίνεται· εἶτα μετὰ γῆς τινος καμινευθεὶς ἀποστάζει ψευδάργυρον, ἣ προσλαβοῦσα χαλκὸν τὸ καλούμενον γίνεται κρᾶμα, ὅ τινες ὀρείχαλκον καλοῦσι· γίνεται δὲ ψευδάργυρος καὶ περὶ τὸν Τμῶλον. ταῦτα δʼ ἐστὶ τὰ χωρία, ἃ οἱ Λέλεγες κατεῖχον· ὡς δʼ αὕτως καὶ τὰ περὶ Ἄσσον.

​And after Scepsis are Andeira, Pioniae, and Gargaris. There is a stone near Andeira which, when burnt, becomes iron; then, when smelted in a furnace with a certain earth, it distills pseudo-silver, which, when copper is added, becomes the so-called mixture, which some call oreichalcos. And pseudo-silver is also produced near Tmolus. These are the places which the Leleges held; and likewise also those around Assus.

Syntax notes3 items
  1. 13.1.54πρῶτος ὧν ἴσμεν συναγαγὼν βιβλία

    The relative pronoun ὧν stands for οὓς, with the genitive plural antecedent ἐκείνων omitted. Its genitive case is due to attraction to the omitted genitive antecedent, which is required as a partitive genitive after the superlative πρῶτος.

  2. 13.1.54μηδὲν ἔχειν φιλοσοφεῖν πραγματικῶς

    The verb ἔχειν combined with an infinitive (φιλοσοφεῖν) expresses capability or possibility ('to be able to'). Combined with the neuter pronoun μηδέν, it means 'to be unable to philosophize systematically in any way.'

  3. 13.1.55ἀφʼ ἧς οὐκ ἦν τῷ κριθέντι ἀναβολὴ τῆς δίκης ἐπὶ τὸν βασιλέα

    The relative phrase ἀφʼ ἧς refers to the antecedent δικαιοδοσίας. The participle τῷ κριθέντι is a dative of possessor or reference. The phrase describes a supreme jurisdiction where the person judged had no right to delay the trial by appealing to the king.

Translated by Gemini 3.5 Flash (published 2026-05-25)urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0099.tlg001.humanitext-grc2:13.1.54-13.1.56