← Strabo

Geography

§1.2.16-1.2.17

Swordfish Hunting and Homer's Poetic Craft

Polybius demonstrates the accuracy of Homer's geography through a detailed description of swordfish hunting in Sicily, and discusses the roles of history, arrangement, and myth in poetry, as well as the plausibility of Odysseus' routes.

View ▾
View
Translation
Typeface
AI ↗
← PrevNext →
§1.2.16

ταῦτα δʼ εἰπὼν διηγεῖται τῶν γαλεωτῶν θήραν, ἣ συνίσταται περὶ τὸ Σκύλλαιον· σκοπὸς γὰρ ἐφέστηκε κοινὸς ὑφορμοῦσιν1 ἐν δικώποις σκαφιδίοις πολλοῖς, δύο καθʼ ἕκαστον σκαφίδιον· καὶ ὁ μὲν ἐλαύνει, ὁ δʼ ἐπὶ τῆς πρώρας ἕστηκε δόρυ ἔχων, σημήναντος τοῦ σκοποῦ τὴν ἐπιφάνειαν τοῦ γαλεώτου· φέρεται δὲ τὸ τρίτον μέρος ἔξαλον τὸ ζῷον. συνάψαντος δὲ τοῦ σκάφους, ὁ μὲν ἔπληξεν ἐκ χειρός, εἶτʼ ἐξέσπασεν ἐκ τοῦ σώματος τὸ δόρυ χωρὶς τῆς ἐπιδορατίδος· ἀγκιστρώδης τε γάρ ἐστι καὶ χαλαρῶς ἐνήρμοσται τῷ δόρατι ἐπίτηδες, καλώδιον δʼ ἔχει μακρὸν ἐξημμένον· τοῦτʼ ἐπιχαλῶσι τῷ τρωθέντι τέως ἕως ἂν κάμῃ σφαδάζον καὶ ὑποφεῦγον· τότε δʼ ἕλκουσιν ἐπὶ τὴν γῆν, ἢ εἰς τὸ σκάφος ἀναλαμβάνουσιν, ἐὰν μὴ μέγα ᾖ τελέως τὸ σῶμα. κἂν ἐκπέσῃ δὲ εἰς τὴν θάλατταν τὸ δόρυ, οὐκ ἀπόλωλεν· ἔστι γὰρ πηκτὸν ἔκ τε δρυὸς καὶ ἐλάτης, ὥστε βαπτιζομένου τοῦ δρυΐνου βάρει μετέωρον εἶναι τὸ λοιπὸν καὶ εὐανάληπτον. συμβαίνειν δέ ποτε καὶ τιτρώσκεσθαι διὰ τοῦ σκαφιδίου τὸν κωπηλάτην διὰ τὸ μέγεθος τοῦ ξίφους τῶν γαλεωτῶν καὶ τὸ τὴν ἀκμὴν τοῦ ζῴου συαγρώδη εἶναι καὶ τὴν θήραν. ἔκ τε δὴ τῶν τοιούτων εἰκάζοι τις ἄν, φησί, περὶ Σικελίαν γενέσθαι τὴν πλάνην κατὰ τὸν Ὅμηρον, ὅτι τῇ Σκύλλῃ προσῆψε τὴν τοιαύτην θήραν ἣ μάλιστʼ ἐπιχώριός ἐστι τῷ Σκυλλαίῳ, καὶ ἐκ τῶν περὶ τῆς Χαρύβδεως λεγομένων ὁμοίων τοῖς τοῦ πορθμοῦ πάθεσι. τὸ δέ τρὶς μὲν γάρ τʼ ἀνίησιν ἀντὶ τοῦ δίς, γραφικὸν εἶναι ἁμάρτημα ἢ ἱστορικόν.

​Having said this, he describes the hunt of the swordfish, which takes place around Skyllaion; for a common lookout is stationed on high, while they lie at anchor below in many two-oared boats, two men to each boat. And one of them rows, and the other stands on the prow holding a spear, while the lookout signals the appearance of the swordfish. And the animal is carried along with a third part of its body out of the water. When the boat has closed in, the man strikes it close at hand, and then pulls the shaft of the spear out of the body, leaving the spear-head; for it has a barb and is purposely fitted loosely to the shaft, and has a long cord fastened to it. They let this cord slacken for the wounded beast for a while until it grows weary from struggling and trying to escape; and then they drag it to the land, or take it up into the boat, unless its body is completely huge. And even if the shaft falls into the sea, it is not lost; for it is joined together from oak and pine, so that even if the oak part is submerged by its weight, the remaining part is kept afloat and is easy to recover. And he says that it sometimes happens that even the oarsman is wounded through the boat, because of the size of the swordfish’s sword and because the fierceness of the animal and its hunt are like those of a wild boar. From such facts, then, he says, one might suppose that the wandering took place around Sicily according to Homer, because he attached to Scylla such a hunt which is especially local to Skyllaion, and from what is said about Charybdis, which is similar to the conditions of the strait. But as for the words “for thrice indeed she lets it loose,” instead of “twice,” he says it is a scribal error or a historical mistake.

§1.2.17

καὶ τὰ ἐν τῇ Μήνιγγι δὲ τοῖς περὶ τῶν Λωτοφάγων εἰρημένοις συμφωνεῖν. εἰ δέ τινα μὴ συμφωνεῖ, μεταβολὰς αἰτιᾶσθαι δεῖν ἢ ἄγνοιαν ἢ καὶ ποιητικὴν ἐξουσίαν, ἣ συνέστηκεν ἐξ ἱστορίας καὶ διαθέσεως καὶ μύθου. τῆς μὲν οὖν ἱστορίας ἀλήθειαν εἶναι τέλος, ὡς ἐν νεῶν καταλόγῳ τὰ ἑκάστοις τόποις συμβεβηκότα λέγοντος τοῦ ποιητοῦ, τὴν μὲν πετρήεσσαν τὴν δὲ ἐσχατόωσαν πόλιν, ἄλλην δὲ πολυτρήρωνα, τὴν δʼ ἀγχίαλον· τῆς δὲ διαθέσεως ἐνέργειαν εἶναι τὸ τέλος, ὡς ὅταν μαχομένους εἰσάγῃ, μύθου δὲ ἡδονὴν καὶ ἔκπληξιν. τὸ δὲ πάντα πλάττειν οὐ πιθανόν, οὐδʼ Ὁμηρικόν· τὴν γὰρ ἐκείνου ποίησιν φιλοσόφημα πάντας νομίζειν, οὐχ ὡς Ἐρατοσθένης φησί, κελεύων μὴ κρίνειν πρὸς τὴν διάνοιαν τὰ ποιήματα, μηδʼ ἱστορίαν ἀπʼ αὐτῶν ζητεῖν. πιθανώτερόν τε τό ἔνθεν δʼ ἐννῆμαρ φερόμην ὀλοοῖς ἀνέμοισιν ἐν βραχεῖ διαστήματι δέχεσθαι (οἱ γὰρ ὀλοοὶ οὐκ εὐθύδρομοι) ἢ ἐξωκεανίζειν,2 ὡς ἂν οὐρίων πνεόντων συνεχῶς. συνθεὶς δὲ τὸ διάστημα τὸ ἐκ Μαλεῶν ἐπὶ στήλας σταδίων δισμυρίων καὶ δισχιλίων πεντακοσίων, εἰ, φησί, τοῦτο θείημεν ἐν ταῖς ἐννέα ἡμέραις διηνύσθαι ἰσοταχῶς, ἑκάστης ἂν ἡμέρας ὁ πλοῦς συμβαίνοι σταδίων δισχιλίων πεντακοσίων. τίς οὖν ἱστόρηκεν ἐκ Λυκίας ἢ Ῥόδου δευτεραῖόν3 τινα ἀφιγμένον εἰς Ἀλεξάνδρειαν, ὄντος τοῦ διαστήματος σταδίων τετρακισχιλίων; πρὸς δὲ τοὺς ἐπιζητοῦντας πῶς τρὶς εἰς Σικελίαν ἐλθὼν οὐδʼ ἅπαξ διὰ τοῦ πορθμοῦ πέπλευκεν Ὀδυσσεύς, ἀπολογεῖται διότι καὶ οἱ ὕστερον ἔφευγον ἅπαντες τὸν πλοῦν τοῦτον.

​And he says that the events in Meninx also agree with what is said about the Lotus-eaters. But if some things do not agree, one must blame changes, or ignorance, or even poetic license, which consists of history, arrangement, and myth. Now, the end of history is truth, as when the poet mentions the characteristics of each place in the “Catalogue of Ships,” calling one city “rocky,” another “outermost,” another “abounding in doves,” and another “by the sea”; but the end of arrangement is vividness, as when he introduces men fighting; and that of myth is pleasure and wonder. But to invent everything is not plausible, nor is it Homeric; for everyone regards his poetry as a philosophical work, not as Eratosthenes says, commanding us not to judge the poems by their thought, nor to seek history from them. And it is more plausible to understand the words “and thence for nine days I was carried by destructive winds” as referring to a short distance (for destructive winds do not blow in a straight course) than to push him out into the Ocean, as if favorable winds had blown continuously. And having calculated the distance from Malea to the Pillars as twenty-two thousand five hundred stadia, if, he says, we assume that this was traversed with equal speed in the nine days, the voyage of each day would turn out to be two thousand five hundred stadia. Who, then, has recorded that anyone has arrived in Alexandria from Lycia or Rhodes on the second day, the distance being four thousand stadia? And to those who ask how Odysseus, having come thrice to Sicily, never once sailed through the strait, he replies in defense that all later people also avoided this voyage.

Syntax notes3 items
  1. 1.2.16ὑφορμοῦσιν

    Dative present participle plural. Grammatically, it depends on the adjective κοινός ("common to"), referring to the fishermen or boats waiting at anchor below.

  2. 1.2.17ἐξωκεανίζειν

    Present infinitive meaning "to push (him) out into the Ocean." It is positioned after the comparative conjunction ἤ ("than") in parallel with the preceding infinitive δέχεσθαι, both depending on the comparative πιθανώτερον.

  3. 1.2.17δευτεραῖόν

    An accusative adjective which, according to Greek predicative convention for expressing elapsed time, functions adverbially to mean "on the second day" or "within two days," modifying the subject of the infinitive, τινα.

Translated by Gemini 3.5 Flash (published 2026-05-25)urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0099.tlg001.humanitext-grc2:1.2.16-1.2.17