← Aristotle

On Breath

§2

Critique of Aristogenes and the Digestion of Breath

This section critically examines Aristogenes' theory on the digestion and maintenance of the spirit through respiration, highlighting absurdities such as the speed of digestion and shared passages. It further discusses how non-respiring and aquatic organisms maintain and nourish their connate spirit.

View ▾
View
Translation
Typeface
AI ↗
← PrevNext →
§2

​2 Ἡ δʼ ἐκ τῆς ἀναπνοῆς,1 ὥσπερ Ἀριστογένης οἴεται (τροφὴν γὰρ οἴεται καὶ τὸ πνεῦμα πεττομένου τοῦ ἀέρος ἐν τῷ πνεύμονι· τοῦτο δʼ εἰς τὰ ἀγγεῖα διαδίδοσθαι, τὸ περίττωμα πάλιν ἐκπέμπεσθαι) πλείους ἔχει τὰς ἀπορίας. ἥ τε γὰρ πέψις ὑπὸ τίνος; εἰκὸς μὲν γὰρ ὑπʼ αὐτοῦ, καθάπερ καὶ τῶν ἄλλων. αὐτὸ δὲ τοῦτʼ ἄτοπον, εἰ μὴ διαφέρει τοῦ ἔξω ἀέρος· οὕτω δʼ ἡ θερμότης ἂν πέττοι. καὶ μὴν καὶ παχύτερον αὐτὸν εὔλογον εἶναι μεθʼ ὑγρότητος τῆς ἀπὸ τῶν ἀγγείων ὄντα καὶ τῶν ὅλων ὄγκων, ὥσθʼ ἡ πέψις ἂν εἰς τὸ σωματῶδες2 εἴη. τὸ δὲ περίττωμα, εἴπερ γίνεται λεπτότερον, οὐ πιθανόν. ἄλογος δὲ καὶ ἡ ταχυτὴς τῆς πέψεως. εὐθὺς γὰρ μετὰ τὴν εἰσπνοὴν ἡ ἐκπνοή. τί οὖν τὸ οὕτω ταχὺ μεταβάλλον καὶ ἀλλοιοῦν; ὑπολάβοι γὰρ ἄν τις μάλιστα τὸ θερμόν, καὶ μαρτυρεῖ οὕτως ἡ αἴσθησις· ὁ γὰρ ἐκπνεόμενος θερμός. ἔτι δʼ εἰ μὲν ἐν τῷ πνεύμονι καὶ τῇ ἀρτηρίᾳ τὸ πεττόμενον, ἡ τοῦ θερμοῦ δύναμις ἐν τούτοις· ὅπερ οὔ φασιν, ἀλλʼ ἐν τῇ κινήσει τῇ τοῦ πνεύματος. ἐκθερμαίνεσθαι τὴν τροφήν.3 εἰ δʼ ἐξ ἑτέρου τινὸς οἷον ἐπισπᾶται ἢ καὶ κινοῦντος δέχεται, τοῦτʼ ἔτι θαυμασιώτερον. ἅμα δὲ καὶ οὐκ αὐτὸ τὸ πρῶτον κινοῦν. ἔτι δʼ ἡ μὲν ἀναπνοὴ μέχρι τοῦ πνεύμονος, ὥσπερ λέγουσιν αὐτοί, τὸ δὲ πνεῦμα διʼ ὅλου τὸ σύμφυτον. εἰ δʼ ἀπὸ τούτου διαδίδοται καὶ πρὸς τὰ κάτω καὶ πρὸς τὰ ἄλλα, πῶς ἡ πέψις οὕτω ταχεῖα; θαυμασιώτερον γὰρ τοῦτο καὶ μεῖζον· οὐ γὰρ διαπέμπει τοῦτό γʼ εὐθὺς πεττόμενον τὸν ἀέρα τοῖς κάτω. καίτοι τὸ μὲν δόξειεν ἂν ἀναγκαῖον εἶναι τοῦτο τῆς πέψεως γινομένης4 ἐν τῷ πνεύμονι τῆς τʼ ἀναπνοῆς κοινωνούντων καὶ τῶν κάτω, μεῖζον δʼ οὕτως ἔτι καὶ παραδοξότερον τὸ συμβαῖνον· οἷον γὰρ διόδῳ καὶ θίξει γίνεται μόνον ἡ πέψις. ἄλογον δὲ καὶ τουτὶ καὶ λογοδεστερον, εἰ ὁ αὐτὸς πόρος τῆς τροφῆς καὶ τοῦ περιττώματος. εἰ δὲ διʼ ἄλλου τινὸς τῶν ἐντός, οἱ αὐτοὶ λόγοι οἳ καὶ πρότερον, εἰ μὴ τοῦτο λέγοι τις, ὡς οὐ πάσης τῆς τροφῆς οὐδὲ πᾶσι γίνεται περίττωμα, καθάπερ οὐδὲ τοῖς φυτοῖς, ἐπεὶ οὐδὲ τῶν τοῦ σώματος μερῶν ἑκάστου λαβεῖν ἐστιν, εἰ μή, ὅτι γε παντός. ἀλλʼ ἄρα γε ἡ μὲν ἀγγείων αὔξησις ἡ αὐτὴ καὶ τῶν ἄλλων μορίων, εὐρυνομένων δὲ καὶ διισταμένων τούτων πλείων ὁ ἀὴρ ὁ εἰσρέων καὶ ἐκρέων. εἰ δέ τι ἀναγκαῖον ἐνυπάρχει, τοῦτο αὐτὸ ζητεῖται, τίς ὁ φυσικός; καὶ πῶς οὗτος πλείων ὑγιῶς, ἐκ τούτου φανερὸν ἂν εἴη. τοῖς δὲ δὴ μὴ ἀναπνευστικοῖς τίς ἡ τροφὴ τοῦ συμφύτου καὶ τίς ἡ αὔξησις; οὐ γὰρ ἔτι τούτοις ἀπὸ τοῦ ἔξωθεν. εἰ δʼ ἀπὸ τῶν ἐντὸς καὶ τῆς κοινῆς τροφῆς, εὔλογον κἀκείνοις· ἀπὸ γὰρ τῶν αὐτῶν τὰ ὅμοια καὶ ὡσαύτως, εἰ μὴ ἄρα καὶ τούτοις ἀπὸ τοῦ ἐκτός, ὥσπερ καὶ τῶν ὀσμῶν αἰσθάνονται. ἀλλʼ οὔτοιγʼ οἷον ἀναπνοὴ γίνεται. περὶ οὗ κἂν ἀπορήσειέ τις, εἰ κατὰ ἀλήθειάν ἐστιν, αὐτό τε τοῦτο προφέρων καὶ τὴν ἐπίσπασιν τῆς τροφῆς (ὁλκὴ γὰρ ἅμα πνεύματος), ἔτι δʼ ὑπὲρ τῆς καταψύξεως ἀντιλέγων, ὡς κἀκείνων δεομένων. εἰ δὲ διὰ τοῦ ὑποζώματος αὐτοῖς γίνεται, ταύτῃ δῆλον ὅτι καὶ ἡ τοῦ ἀέρος εἴσοδος· ὥσθʼ ὅμοιόν τι τῇ ἀναπνοῇ. πλὴν οὐκ ἀφορίζεται τίς ἡ ὁλκὴ καὶ ὑπὸ τίνος, ἢ εἰ μὴ ὁλκή, πῶς ἡ εἴσοδος; εἰ μὴ ἄρα αὐτομάτως. τοῦτο μὲν οὖν ἔχει καὶ αὐτὸ καθʼ αὑτὸ σκέψιν. τοῖς δὲ δὴ ἐνύγροις τίς ἡ τροφὴ καὶ αὔξησις τοῦ συμφύτου; χωρὶς γὰρ τοῦ μὴ ἀναπνεῖν οὐδʼ ἐνυπάρχειν ὅλως ἐν τῷ ὑγρῷ φαμεν ἀέρα. λοιπὸν ἄρα διὰ τῆς τροφῆς, ὡς οὐχ ὁμοίως πᾶσιν, ἢ κἀκεῖνα διὰ τῆς τροφῆς τὰ μὴ ἔνυγρα· τριῶν γὰρ τούτων ἀναγκαῖον ἕν. καὶ ταῦτα μὲν ὡς περὶ τὴν αὔξησιν καὶ τροφὴν τοῦ πνεύματος.

​2 On the other hand, that which is derived from respiration, as Aristogenes thinks—for he thinks that the spirit also is nourished by the air being digested in the lung, and that this is distributed into the vessels, while the residue is sent out again—presents more difficulties. For, in the first place, by what is the digestion performed? For it is reasonable that it is by the spirit itself, just as with other things. But this very thing is absurd, if it does not differ from the outside air; for in that case would the heat digest it? And indeed, it is reasonable that it is thicker, being accompanied by moisture from the vessels and the whole masses, so that the digestion would be into the bodily state. And the residue, if indeed it becomes thinner, is not plausible. And the speed of the digestion is also unreasonable. For exhalation follows immediately after inhalation. What is it, then, that changes and alters it so quickly? For one might especially suppose it to be the heat, and sensation bears witness to this; for the exhaled air is warm. Furthermore, if that which is digested is in the lung and the artery, the power of the heat must be in these; which is not what they say, but rather that the nourishment is heated in the movement of the spirit. But if it is as it were drawn from something else, or receives it from something that moves it, this is still more wonderful; and at the same time, it would not be the first mover itself. Furthermore, respiration is only as far as the lung, as they themselves say, but the connate spirit is throughout the whole. But if it is distributed from this both to the lower parts and to the others, how is the digestion so rapid? For this is more wonderful and a greater difficulty; for it does not immediately send this digested air to the lower parts. And yet this would seem to be necessary, if digestion takes place in the lung and the lower parts also share in respiration; but even so, what happens is still more difficult and paradoxical; for digestion would occur as it were by mere passage and contact. And this too is unreasonable and more theoretical, if the passage for the nourishment and the residue is the same. But if it is through some other of the internal passages, the same arguments apply as before, unless one were to say this: that residue does not come from all nourishment nor in all things, just as it does not in plants, since indeed it is not possible to find residue for each of the parts of the body, except perhaps for the whole. But is the growth of the vessels the same as that of the other parts, and as these dilate and separate, the air that flows in and out becomes more? But if some necessary thing is present within, this is the very thing being sought: what is the natural one? And how this becomes greater in a healthy way would be clear from this. And for those creatures that do not respire, what is the nourishment of the connate spirit and what is its growth? For it can no longer be from the outside for them. But if it is from the internal parts and the common nourishment, it is reasonable for them too; for similar things come from the same things and in the same way, unless indeed for them too it is from the outside, in the same way as they perceive odors. But surely no such thing as respiration occurs in them. Concerning which one might be puzzled whether it is true, bringing forward this very point and the attraction of nourishment (for it is at the same time an attraction of spirit), and furthermore arguing on behalf of cooling, on the ground that they too require it. But if it occurs to them through the diaphragm, in this way it is clear that the entrance of air also takes place; so that it is something similar to respiration. Except that it is not defined what the attraction is and by what it is caused, or if it is not an attraction, how the entrance occurs, unless indeed it is spontaneous. This subject, then, also requires consideration by itself. And for aquatic creatures, what is the nourishment and growth of the connate spirit? For apart from the fact that they do not respire, we say that there is no air at all in the liquid. It remains, then, that it is through nourishment, though not in the same way for all, or else those other non-aquatic creatures also are nourished through nourishment; for one of these three must be necessary. And these are the matters concerning the growth and nourishment of the spirit.

Syntax notes4 items
  1. 481a28Ἡ δʼ ἐκ τῆς ἀναπνοῆς

    In contrast with the phrase ἡ μὲν οὖν ἐκ τῆς τροφῆς αὔξησις καὶ διαμονὴ at the end of the previous section, the nouns αὔξησις καὶ διαμονή (growth and maintenance) are omitted here. This marks the transition to the discussion on the growth and maintenance of the spirit through respiration.

  2. 481b5εἰς τὸ σωματῶδες

    σωματῶδες refers to a bodily or solid state. This phrase points out the absurdity of Aristogenes' theory, suggesting that if the inhaled air becomes thicker due to the moisture within the vessels, the process of digestion (pepsis) would lead to the formation of a solid body rather than a subtle spirit.

  3. 481b13ἐκθερμαίνεσθαι τὴν τροφήν

    An accusative with infinitive construction functioning as indirect speech governed by the verb φασιν (they say) from the preceding sentence, conveying the meaning '(but they say) that the nourishment is heated in the movement of the spirit.'

  4. 481b23τῆς πέψεως γινομένης

    A genitive absolute construction (τῆς πέψεως γινομένης...), which is parallel with τῆς τʼ ἀναπνοῆς κοινωνούντων καὶ τῶν κάτω. The genitive plural participle κοινωνούντων has τῶν κάτω (the lower parts) as its subject and takes the genitive τῆς τʼ ἀναπνοῆς (respiration) as its object.

Translated by Gemini 3.5 Flash (published 2026-05-22)urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0086.tlg043.humanitext-grc1:2