← Aristotle

Politics

§5.1307a

Causes of Faction and Dissolution in Aristocracies

Discusses how the ambition of powerful individuals seeking more power and the demand of the poor for land redistribution cause factions in aristocracies. It also explains the process by which polities and aristocracies dissolve and transition when they deviate from justice and the balance of mixing democracy and oligarchy is lost, illustrating with concrete examples from Thurii and Locri.

View ▾
View
Translation
Typeface
AI ↗
← PrevNext →
§5.1307a

θλιβόμενοι γάρ τινες διὰ τὸν πόλεμον ἠξίουν ἀνάδαστον ποιεῖν τὴν χώραν)· ἔτι ἐάν τις μέγας ᾖ1 καὶ δυνάμενος ἔτι μείζων εἶναι, ἵνα μοναρχῇ, ὥσπερ ἐν Λακεδαίμονι δοκεῖ Παυσανίας ὁ στρατηγήσας κατὰ τὸν Μηδικὸν πόλεμον, καὶ ἐν Καρχηδόνι Ἄννων. λύονται δὲ μάλιστα αἵ τε πολιτεῖαι καὶ αἱ ἀριστοκρατίαι διὰ τὴν ἐν αὐτῇ τῇ πολιτείᾳ τοῦ δικαίου παρέκβασιν. ἀρχὴ γὰρ τὸ μὴ μεμεῖχθαι καλῶς ἐν μὲν τῇ πολιτείᾳ δημοκρατίαν καὶ ὀλιγαρχίαν, ἐν δὲ τῇ ἀριστοκρατίᾳ ταῦτά τε καὶ τὴν ἀρετήν, μάλιστα δὲ τὰ δύο· λέγω δὲ τὰ δύο δῆμον καὶ ὀλιγαρχίαν. ταῦτα γὰρ αἱ πολιτεῖαί τε πειρῶνται μιγνύναι καὶ αἱ πολλαὶ τῶν καλουμένων ἀριστοκρατιῶν. διαφέρουσι γὰρ τῶν ὀνομαζομένων πολιτειῶν αἱ ἀριστοκρατίαι τούτῳ, καὶ διὰ τοῦτʼ εἰσὶν αἱ μὲν ἧττον αἱ δὲ μᾶλλον μόνιμοι αὐτῶν· τὰς γὰρ ἀποκλινούσας μᾶλλον πρὸς τὴν ὀλιγαρχίαν ἀριστοκρατίας καλοῦσιν, τὰς δὲ πρὸς τὸ πλῆθος πολιτείας· διόπερ ἀσφαλέστεραι αἱ τοιαῦται τῶν ἑτέρων εἰσίν· κρεῖττόν τε γὰρ τὸ πλεῖον, καὶ μᾶλλον ἀγαπῶσιν ἴσον ἔχοντες, οἱ δʼ ἐν ταῖς εὐπορίαις, ἂν ἡ πολιτεία διδῷ τὴν ὑπεροχήν, ὑβρίζειν ζητοῦσι καὶ πλεονεκτεῖν. ὅλως δʼ ἐφʼ ὁπότερον ἂν ἐγκλίνῃ ἡ πολιτεία, ἐπὶ τοῦτο μεθίσταται ἑκατέρων τὸ σφέτερον αὐξανόντων, οἷον ἡ μὲν πολιτεία εἰς δῆμον, ἀριστοκρατία δʼ εἰς ὀλιγαρχίαν· ἢ εἰς τἀναντία, οἷον ἡ μὲν ἀριστοκρατία εἰς δῆμον (ὡς ἀδικούμενοι γὰρ περισπῶσιν εἰς τοὐναντίον οἱ ἀπορώτεροι), αἱ δὲ πολιτεῖαι εἰς ὀλιγαρχίαν (μόνον γὰρ μόνιμον τὸ κατʼ ἀξίαν ἴσον καὶ τὸ ἔχειν τὰ αὑτῶν)· συνέβη δὲ τὸ εἰρημένον ἐν Θουρίοις. διὰ μὲν γὰρ τὸ ἀπὸ πλείονος τιμήματος εἶναι τὰς ἀρχὰς2 εἰς ἔλαττον μετέβη καὶ εἰς ἀρχεῖα πλείω, διὰ δὲ τὸ τὴν χώραν ὅλην τοὺς γνωρίμους συγκτήσασθαι παρὰ τὸν νόμον (ἡ γὰρ πολιτεία ὀλιγαρχικωτέρα ἦν, ὥστε ἐδύναντο πλεονεκτεῖν) ὁ δὲ δῆμος γυμνασθεὶς ἐν τῷ πολέμῳ τῶν φρουρῶν ἐγένετο κρείττων, ἕως ἀφεῖσαν τῆς χώρας ὅσοι πλείω ἦσαν ἔχοντες.3 ἔτι διὰ τὸ πάσας τὰς ἀριστοκρατικὰς πολιτείας ὀλιγαρχικὰς εἶναι μᾶλλον πλεονεκτοῦσιν οἱ γνώριμοι, οἷον καὶ ἐν Λακεδαίμονι εἰς ὀλίγους αἱ οὐσίαι ἔρχονται· καὶ ἔξεστι ποιεῖν ὅ τι ἂν θέλωσι τοῖς γνωρίμοις μᾶλλον, καὶ κηδεύειν ὅτῳ θέλουσιν, διὸ καὶ ἡ Λοκρῶν πόλις ἀπώλετο ἐκ τῆς πρὸς Διονύσιον κηδείας, ὃ ἐν δημοκρατίᾳ οὐκ ἂν ἐγένετο, οὐδʼ ἂν ἐν ἀριστοκρατίᾳ εὖ μεμειγμένῃ.

​for some, being hard pressed because of the war, demanded to make a redistribution of the land.) Furthermore, [factions arise] if someone is great and able to be still greater, so that he may rule as monarch, just as Pausanias, who held the command during the Persian War, seems [to have done] in Lacedaemon, and Hanno in Carthage. And both polities and aristocracies are dissolved most of all because of the deviation from justice in the constitution itself. For the beginning [of this] is the fact that democracy and oligarchy have not been well mixed in the polity, and in aristocracy these and virtue, but most of all the two; and by the two I mean the people and oligarchy. For both polities and many of the so-called aristocracies attempt to mix these. For aristocracies differ from the so-called polities in this, and because of this, some of them are less and others are more stable; for those inclining more toward oligarchy they call aristocracies, and those toward the multitude, polities; wherefore such [constitutions] are safer than the other ones; for the majority is stronger, and they are more content when they have an equal share, whereas those in affluent circumstances, if the constitution gives them the superiority, seek to behave insolently and to take more than their share. And on the whole, in whichever direction the constitution inclines, in this direction it changes, as each of the two sides increases their own [power], for example, the polity into democracy, and aristocracy into oligarchy; or into the opposites, for example, aristocracy into democracy (for the poorer, as if being wronged, drag [the constitution] back into the opposite direction), and polities into oligarchy (for the only stable thing is equality according to worth and to have one’s own possessions); and what has been said happened in Thurii. For because the offices were on the basis of a higher property qualification, it changed to a lower one and to more offices, but because the notables acquired the whole land contrary to the law (for the constitution was rather oligarchical, so that they were able to take more than their share), the people, having been trained in the war, became stronger than the guards, until those who had more than their share of the land gave it up. Furthermore, because all aristocratic constitutions are rather oligarchical, the notables take more than their share, just as in Lacedaemon also properties come into the hands of few; and the notables are more permitted to do whatever they wish, and to contract marriage alliances with whomever they wish, wherefore also the city of the Locrians was ruined because of the marriage alliance with Dionysius, which would not have happened in a democracy, nor in an aristocracy well mixed.

Syntax notes3 items
  1. 1307aἔτι ἐάν τις μέγας ᾖ

    The apodosis for the conditional clause ἐάν τις μέγας ᾖ is not explicitly stated. In context, a main clause like "factions arise" (στάσεις γίνονται) or "change occurs" (μεταβολὴ γίγνεται) must be supplied from the preceding discussion.

  2. 1307aδιὰ μὲν γὰρ τὸ ἀπὸ πλείονος τιμήματος εἶναι τὰς ἀρχὰς

    Within the accusative gerundial phrase τὸ ... εἶναι governed by the preposition διὰ, the accusative τὰς ἀρχὰς functions as the subject of the infinitive εἶναι. The prepositional phrase ἀπὸ πλείονος τιμήματος is used predicatively to mean "being on the basis of a higher property qualification."

  3. 1307aἕως ἀφεῖσαν τῆς χώρας ὅσοι πλείω ἦσαν ἔχοντες

    A clause introduced by the conjunction ἕως ("until"). ἀφεῖσαν is the aorist active indicative 3rd person plural of ἀφίημι. The subject is ὅσοι πλείω ἦσαν ἔχοντες ("as many as had more"), and τῆς χώρας ("the land") is in the genitive as the object of ἀφεῖσαν (partitive genitive or genitive of separation/abandonment).

Translated by Gemini 3.5 Flash (published 2026-05-22)urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0086.tlg035.humanitext-grc2:5.1307a