- Source
- Aristotle. Aristotelis Politica. Ross, William David, editor. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1957 (printing).
- Translation
- AI-generated (gemini-3.5-flash) — machine translation; may contain errors
- Languages
- 日本語 · English · 简体中文 · 한국어
- CTS URN
- urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0086.tlg035.humanitext-grc2:5.1302a
- Generated
- Humanitext Reader · reader.humanitext.ai · 2026-10-30
Aristotle argues for the need to combine numerical and qualitative equality, explains why democracy is more stable than oligarchy, and begins analyzing the causes of constitutional change and factional conflict through three main aspects: states of mind, objectives, and specific occasions.
ταῦτα δʼ ἐν πλείοσιν·1 εὐγενεῖς γὰρ καὶ ἀγαθοὶ οὐδαμοῦ ἑκατόν, εὔποροι δὲ πολλαχοῦ. τὸ δὲ ἁπλῶς πάντῃ καθʼ ἑκατέραν τετάχθαι τὴν ἰσότητα φαῦλον.2 φανερὸν δʼ ἐκ τοῦ συμβαίνοντος· οὐδεμία γὰρ μόνιμος ἐκ τῶν τοιούτων πολιτειῶν. τούτου δʼ αἴτιον ὅτι ἀδύνατον ἀπὸ τοῦ πρώτου καὶ τοῦ ἐν ἀρχῇ ἡμαρτημένου μὴ ἀπαντᾶν εἰς τὸ τέλος κακόν τι. διὸ δεῖ τὰ μὲν ἀριθμητικῇ ἰσότητι χρῆσθαι, τὰ δὲ τῇ κατʼ ἀξίαν. ὅμως δὲ ἀσφαλεστέρα καὶ ἀστασίαστος μᾶλλον ἡ δημοκρατία τῆς ὀλιγαρχίας. ἐν μὲν γὰρ ταῖς ὀλιγαρχίαις ἐγγίνονται δύο, ἥ τε πρὸς ἀλλήλους στάσις καὶ ἔτι ἡ πρὸς τὸν δῆμον, ἐν δὲ ταῖς δημοκρατίαις ἡ πρὸς τὴν ὀλιγαρχίαν μόνον, αὐτῷ δὲ πρὸς αὑτόν, ὅ τι καὶ ἄξιον εἰπεῖν, οὐκ ἐγγίνεται τῷ δήμῳ στάσις· ἔτι δὲ ἡ ἐκ τῶν μέσων πολιτεία ἐγγυτέρω τοῦ δήμου ἢ τῶν ὀλίγων· ἥπερ ἐστὶν ἀσφαλεστάτη τῶν τοιούτων πολιτειῶν. ἐπεὶ δὲ σκοποῦμεν ἐκ τίνων αἵ τε στάσεις γίνονται καὶ αἱ μεταβολαὶ περὶ τὰς πολιτείας, ληπτέον καθόλου πρῶτον τὰς ἀρχὰς καὶ τὰς αἰτίας αὐτῶν. εἰσὶ δὴ σχεδὸν ὡς εἰπεῖν τρεῖς τὸν ἀριθμόν, ἃς διοριστέον καθʼ αὑτὰς τύπῳ πρῶτον. δεῖ γὰρ λαβεῖν πῶς τε ἔχοντες στασιάζουσι καὶ τίνων ἕνεκεν, καὶ τρίτον τίνες ἀρχαὶ γίνονται τῶν πολιτικῶν ταραχῶν καὶ τῶν πρὸς ἀλλήλους στάσεων. τοῦ μὲν οὖν αὐτοὺς ἔχειν πως πρὸς τὴν μεταβολὴν αἰτίαν3 καθόλου μάλιστα θετέον περὶ ἧς ἤδη τυγχάνομεν εἰρηκότες. οἱ μὲν γὰρ ἰσότητος ἐφιέμενοι στασιάζουσιν ἂν νομίζωσιν ἔλαττον ἔχειν ὄντες ἴσοι τοῖς πλεονεκτοῦσιν, οἱ δὲ τῆς ἀνισότητος καὶ τῆς ὑπεροχῆς ἂν ὑπολαμβάνωσιν ὄντες ἄνισοι μὴ πλέον ἔχειν ἀλλʼ ἴσον ἢ ἔλαττον (τούτων δʼ ἔστι μὲν ὀρέγεσθαι δικαίως, ἔστι δὲ καὶ ἀδίκως)· ἐλάττους τε γὰρ ὄντες ὅπως ἴσοι ὦσι στασιάζουσι, καὶ ἴσοι ὄντες ὅπως μείζους. πῶς μὲν οὖν ἔχοντες στασιάζουσιν, εἴρηται· περὶ ὧν δὲ στασιάζουσιν ἐστὶ κέρδος καὶ τιμὴ καὶ τἀναντία τούτοις. καὶ γὰρ ἀτιμίαν φεύγοντες καὶ ζημίαν, ἢ ὑπὲρ αὑτῶν ἢ τῶν φίλων, στασιάζουσιν ἐν ταῖς πόλεσιν. αἱ δʼ αἰτίαι καὶ ἀρχαὶ τῶν κινήσεων, ὅθεν αὐτοί τε διατίθενται τὸν εἰρημένον τρόπον καὶ περὶ τῶν λεχθέντων, ἔστι μὲν ὡς τὸν ἀριθμὸν ἑπτὰ τυγχάνουσιν οὖσαι, ἔστι δʼ ὡς πλείους.4 ὧν δύο μέν ἐστι ταὐτὰ τοῖς εἰρημένοις, ἀλλʼ οὐχ ὡσαύτως· διὰ κέρδος γὰρ καὶ διὰ τιμὴν καὶ παροξύνονται πρὸς ἀλλήλους οὐχ ἵνα κτήσωνται σφίσιν αὐτοῖς, ὥσπερ εἴρηται πρότερον,
while these belong to a larger number; for nowhere are there a hundred men of noble birth and virtue, but rich men are in many places. But to be organized absolutely and entirely according to either form of equality is bad. This is clear from what happens; for none of such constitutions is permanent. And the cause of this is that it is impossible, starting from a first error committed at the beginning, not to meet with some evil in the end. Therefore, one must use numerical equality in some things, and equality according to merit in others. Nevertheless, democracy is safer and more free from faction than oligarchy. For in oligarchies two kinds of faction arise, both that of the oligarchs against one another and further that against the people, whereas in democracies there is only the faction against the oligarchy, while faction of the people against itself, which is indeed worth mentioning, does not arise. Further, the constitution based on the middle class is closer to the people than to the few, which is the safest of such constitutions. Since we are examining from what causes factions and changes in constitutions arise, we must first grasp their starting points and causes in general. They are, so to speak, nearly three in number, which we must first define by themselves in outline. For we must grasp in what state of mind men rebel, and for what purposes, and thirdly, what are the starting points of political disturbances and of factions against one another. Now, as the general cause of their being in a certain state of mind toward change, we must chiefly set down the one we happen to have already spoken of. For those who aim at equality rebel if they think they have less although they are equal to those who have more; and those who aim at inequality and superiority rebel if they assume that, being unequal, they do not have more but only equal or less (and of these things it is possible to reach out for justly, but also unjustly). For being less, they rebel in order that they may be equal, and being equal, in order that they may be greater. In what state of mind they rebel, then, has been said. The things about which they rebel are gain and honor, and their opposites. For they also rebel in the cities to avoid dishonor and loss, either on their own behalf or for their friends. But the causes and starting points of the movements, which make them disposed in the way said and about the things mentioned, happen to be seven in number in one way, but more in another. Of these, two are the same as those mentioned, but not in the same way; for it is because of gain and honor that they are also provoked against one another, not in order to acquire them for themselves, as was said before,
- 5.1302aταῦτα δʼ ἐν πλείοσιν
In contrast to the preceding statement that 'nobility and virtue are among few (εὐγένεια γὰρ καὶ ἀρετὴ ἐν ὀλίγοις),' the demonstrative pronoun ταῦτα refers to factors associated with wealth (εὔποροι), which belong to a larger number of people.
- 5.1302aτὸ δὲ ἁπλῶς πάντῃ καθʼ ἑκατέραν τετάχθαι τὴν ἰσότητα φαῦλον
The subject of the perfect passive infinitive τετάχθαι (from τάσσω) is τὴν ἰσότητα, which is modified by καθʼ ἑκατέραν [ἰσότητα]. The entire articular infinitive phrase τὸ ... τετάχθαι functions as the subject, with φαῦλον as the predicate adjective.
- 5.1302aτοῦ μὲν οὖν αὐτοὺς ἔχειν πως πρὸς τὴν μεταβολὴν αἰτίαν
This genitive phrase functions as a genitive of explanation or topic, introducing the first of the three analytical points presented in 1302a21-22 (namely, πῶς ἔχοντες στασιάζουσι, 'in what state of mind men rebel').
- 5.1302aἔστι μὲν ὡς τὸν ἀριθμὸν ἑπτὰ τυγχάνουσιν οὖσαι, ἔστι δʼ ὡς πλείους
The idiom ἔστιν ὡς... means 'in a certain way' or 'from one point of view'. The construction τυγχάνουσιν οὖσαι (τυγχάνω with participle) is used to emphasize the actual state of affairs ('they actually happen to be').
