← Aristotle

Politics

§2.1272b

Lawlessness in Crete and the Carthaginian Regime

After discussing the defects of the Cretan constitution, such as the expulsion of the kosmoi and the lawlessness of the powerful, and its preservation due to isolation, the author transitions to analyzing the Carthaginian constitution, noting its similarities to the Laconian system in its common meals and magistracies.

View ▾
View
Translation
Typeface
AI ↗
← PrevNext →
§2.1272b

ἣν δὲ ποιοῦνται τῆς ἁμαρτίας ταύτης ἰατρείαν,1 ἄτοπος καὶ οὐ πολιτικὴ ἀλλὰ δυναστευτική. πολλάκις γὰρ ἐκβάλλουσι συστάντες τινὲς τοὺς κόσμους ἢ τῶν συναρχόντων αὐτῶν ἢ τῶν ἰδιωτῶν· ἔξεστι δὲ καὶ μεταξὺ τοῖς κόσμοις ἀπειπεῖν τὴν ἀρχήν. ταῦτα δὴ πάντα βέλτιον γίνεσθαι κατὰ νόμον ἢ κατʼ ἀνθρώπων βούλησιν· οὐ γὰρ ἀσφαλὴς ὁ κανών. πάντων δὲ φαυλότατον τὸ τῆς ἀκοσμίας τῶν δυνατῶν, ἣν καθιστᾶσι πολλάκις οἳ ἂν μὴ δίκας βούλωνται δοῦναι τῶν δυνατῶν·2 ᾗ καὶ δῆλον ὡς ἔχει τι πολιτείας ἡ τάξις, ἀλλʼ οὐ πολιτεία ἐστὶν ἀλλὰ δυναστεία μᾶλλον. εἰώθασι δὲ διαλαμβάνοντες τὸν δῆμον καὶ τοὺς φίλους ἀναρχίαν ποιεῖν καὶ στασιάζειν καὶ μάχεσθαι πρὸς ἀλλήλους· καίτοι τί διαφέρει τὸ τοιοῦτον ἢ διά τινος χρόνου μηκέτι πόλιν εἶναι τὴν τοιαύτην,3 ἀλλὰ λύεσθαι τὴν πολιτικὴν κοινωνίαν; ἔστι δʼ ἐπικίνδυνος οὕτως ἔχουσα πόλις, τῶν βουλομένων ἐπιτίθεσθαι καὶ δυναμένων. ἀλλά, καθάπερ εἴρηται, σῴζεται διὰ τὸν τόπον· ξενηλασίας γὰρ τὸ πόρρω πεποίηκεν. διὸ καὶ τὸ τῶν περιοίκων μένει τοῖς Κρησίν, οἱ δʼ εἵλωτες ἀφίστανται πολλάκις. οὔτε γὰρ ἐξωτερικῆς ἀρχῆς κοινωνοῦσιν οἱ Κρῆτες, νεωστί τε πόλεμος ξενικὸς διαβέβηκεν εἰς τὴν νῆσον, ὃς πεποίηκε φανερὰν τὴν ἀσθένειαν τῶν ἐκεῖ νόμων. περὶ μὲν οὖν ταύτης εἰρήσθω τοσαῦθʼ ἡμῖν τῆς πολιτείας. πολιτεύεσθαι δὲ δοκοῦσι καὶ Καρχηδόνιοι καλῶς καὶ πολλὰ περιττῶς πρὸς τοὺς ἄλλους, μάλιστα δʼ ἔνια παραπλησίως τοῖς Λάκωσιν. αὗται γὰρ αἱ τρεῖς πολιτεῖαι ἀλλήλαις τε σύνεγγύς πώς εἰσι καὶ τῶν ἄλλων πολὺ διαφέρουσιν, ἥ τε Κρητικὴ καὶ ἡ Λακωνικὴ καὶ τρίτη τούτων ἡ τῶν Καρχηδονίων. καὶ πολλὰ τῶν τεταγμένων ἔχει παρʼ αὐτοῖς καλῶς· σημεῖον δὲ πολιτείας συντεταγμένης τὸ τὸν δῆμον ἑκουσίον διαμένειν ἐν τῇ τάξει τῆς πολιτείας, καὶ μήτε στάσιν, ὅ τι καὶ ἄξιον εἰπεῖν, γεγενῆσθαι μήτε τύραννον. ἔχει δὲ παραπλήσια τῇ Λακωνικῇ πολιτείᾳ τὰ μὲν συσσίτια τῶν ἑταιριῶν τοῖς φιδιτίοις, τὴν δὲ τῶν ἑκατὸν καὶ τεττάρων ἀρχὴν τοῖς ἐφόροις (πλὴν ὃ οὐ χεῖρον· οἱ μὲν ἐκ τῶν τυχόντων εἰσί, ταύτην δʼ αἱροῦνται τὴν ἀρχὴν ἀριστίνδην), τοὺς δὲ βασιλεῖς καὶ τὴν γερουσίαν ἀνάλογον τοῖς ἐκεῖ βασιλεῦσι καὶ γέρουσιν· καὶ βέλτιον δὲ τοὺς βασιλεῖς μήτε καθʼ αὑτὸ εἶναι γένος μήτε τοῦτο τὸ τυχόν, εἰ δέ τι διαφέρει, ἐκ τούτων αἱρετοὺς μᾶλλον ἢ καθʼ ἡλικίαν. μεγάλων γὰρ κύριοι καθεστῶτες, ἂν εὐτελεῖς ὦσι μεγάλα βλάπτουσι,

​And the remedy which they adopt for this defect is absurd and not constitutional but characteristic of a cabal. For often some individuals form a conspiracy and expel the orderers, either some of their fellow-magistrates or private citizens; and it is also permitted for the orderers to resign their office during their term. Indeed, it is better for all these things to happen according to law than according to human will; for that rule is not safe. But the worst of all is the lawlessness of the powerful, which those of the powerful who do not wish to submit to justice often establish; whereby it is also clear that the arrangement has something of a constitution, but is not a constitution, but rather a cabal. And they are accustomed, by dividing the people and their friends, to create anarchy and to engage in factional strife and fight against one another. And yet, how does such a state differ from no longer being a city for a certain time, but rather having the political association dissolved? A city in this condition is in danger, when there are those who wish and are able to attack it. But, as has been said, it is saved because of its location; for its distance has had the effect of an expulsion of foreigners. Therefore also the condition of the perioikoi remains stable for the Cretans, whereas the helots often revolt. For neither do the Cretans share in any external empire, and recently a foreign war has crossed over into the island, which has made manifest the weakness of the laws there. Concerning this constitution, then, let so much have been said by us. The Carthaginians also seem to be governed well, and in many respects outstandingly compared to others, and especially in some things very similarly to the Laconians. For these three constitutions are somehow close to one another and differ greatly from the others: the Cretan, the Laconian, and third of these, that of the Carthaginians. And many of their institutions are in a good state; and a sign of a well-ordered constitution is that the people voluntarily remain in the order of the constitution, and that neither factional strife worth mentioning has occurred nor a tyrant. It has things similar to the Laconian constitution: on the one hand, the common meals of the clubs to the phiditia, and on the other, the office of the One Hundred and Four to the ephors (except for one point which is not worse: while the ephors are from ordinary people, they elect this office based on merit), and their kings and elders analogous to the kings and elders there; and it is better that their kings are neither from one single family nor from any ordinary family, but if there is some outstanding family, they are elective from these rather than by seniority. For having been established as authorities over great matters, if they are of little worth they do great harm,

Syntax notes3 items
  1. 1272bἣν δὲ ποιοῦνται τῆς ἁμαρτίας ταύτης ἰατρείαν

    The noun ἰατρείαν (remedy) is attracted into the relative clause (ἣν...) and takes the accusative case as the object of ποιοῦνται, rather than being the nominative subject of the main clause predicate ἄτοπος. Syntactically, it functions as: αὕτη ἡ ἰατρεία, ἣν ποιοῦνται..., ἄτοπός ἐστιν (this remedy, which they adopt, is absurd).

  2. 1272b8οἳ ἂν μὴ δίκας βούλωνται δοῦναι τῶν δυνατῶν

    The genitive τῶν δυνατῶν (of the powerful) is a partitive genitive qualifying the relative subject οἳ ἂν (whoever), placed at the end of the clause in a hyperbaton. It translates to 'those of the powerful who do not wish to submit to justice.'

  3. 1272b13τί διαφέρει τὸ τοιοῦτον ἢ διά τινος χρόνου μηκέτι πόλιν εἶναι τὴν τοιαύτην

    The comparative conjunction ἤ (than/from) is followed by accusative-with-infinitive clauses (μηκέτι πόλιν εἶναι τὴν τοιαύτην and λύεσθαι...). Since the verb διαφέρει (differs) carries a comparative meaning, it takes ἤ to compare the current anarchic state (τὸ τοιοῦτον) with the actual dissolution of the political community.

Translated by Gemini 3.5 Flash (published 2026-05-22)urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0086.tlg035.humanitext-grc2:2.1272b