- Source
- Platonis Opera, Tomus III: Tetralogia V-VII. Burnet, John, editor. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1903.
- Translation
- AI-generated (gemini-3.5-flash) — machine translation; may contain errors
- Languages
- 日本語 · English · 简体中文 · 한국어
- CTS URN
- urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0059.tlg023.humanitext-grc2:502-503
- Generated
- Humanitext Reader · reader.humanitext.ai · 2026-10-29
Socrates argues that poetry, especially tragedy, is a form of flattering rhetoric aimed only at pleasing the audience, and questions whether any past Athenian politicians truly possessed the genuine rhetoric that aims to make the citizens better.
ΣΩ. τί δὲ ἡ τῶν χορῶν διδασκαλία καὶ ἡ τῶν διθυράμβων ποίησις; οὐ τοιαύτη τίς σοι καταφαίνεται; ἢ ἡγῇ τι φροντίζειν Κινησίαν τὸν Μέλητος, ὅπως ἐρεῖ τι τοιοῦτον ὅθεν ἂν οἱ ἀκούοντες βελτίους γίγνοιντο, ἢ ὅτι μέλλει χαριεῖσθαι1 τῷ ὄχλῳ τῶν θεατῶν; ΚΑΛ. δῆλον δὴ τοῦτό γε, ὦ Σώκρατες, Κινησίου γε πέρι. ΣΩ. τί δὲ ὁ πατὴρ αὐτοῦ Μέλης; ἦ πρὸς τὸ βέλτιστον βλέπων ἐδόκει σοι κιθαρῳδεῖν; ἢ ἐκεῖνος μὲν οὐδὲ πρὸς τὸ ἥδιστον; ἠνία γὰρ ᾁδων τοὺς θεατάς. ἀλλὰ δὴ σκόπει· οὐχὶ ἥ τε κιθαρῳδικὴ δοκεῖ σοι πᾶσα καὶ ἡ τῶν διθυράμβων ποίησις ἡδονῆς χάριν ηὑρῆσθαι; ΚΑΛ. ἔμοιγε. ΣΩ. τί δὲ δὴ ἡ σεμνὴ αὕτη καὶ θαυμαστή, ἡ τῆς τραγῳδίας ποίησις, ἐφʼ ᾧ ἐσπούδακεν; πότερόν ἐστιν αὐτῆς τὸ ἐπιχείρημα καὶ ἡ σπουδή, ὡς σοὶ δοκεῖ, χαρίζεσθαι τοῖς θεαταῖς μόνον, ἢ καὶ διαμάχεσθαι, ἐάν τι αὐτοῖς ἡδὺ μὲν ᾖ καὶ κεχαρισμένον, πονηρὸν δέ, ὅπως τοῦτο μὲν μὴ ἐρεῖ,2 εἰ δέ τι τυγχάνει ἀηδὲς καὶ ὠφέλιμον, τοῦτο δὲ καὶ λέξει καὶ ᾁσεται, ἐάντε χαίρωσιν ἐάντε μή; ποτέρως σοι δοκεῖ παρεσκευάσθαι ἡ τῶν τραγῳδιῶν ποίησις; ΚΑΛ. δῆλον δὴ τοῦτό γε, ὦ Σώκρατες, ὅτι πρὸς τὴν ἡδονὴν μᾶλλον ὥρμηται καὶ τὸ χαρίζεσθαι τοῖς θεαταῖς. ΣΩ. οὐκοῦν τὸ τοιοῦτον, ὦ Καλλίκλεις, ἔφαμεν νυνδὴ κολακείαν εἶναι; ΚΑΛ. πάνυ γε. ΣΩ. φέρε δή, εἴ τις περιέλοι τῆς ποιήσεως πάσης τό τε μέλος καὶ τὸν ῥυθμὸν καὶ τὸ μέτρον, ἄλλο τι ἢ λόγοι γίγνονται τὸ λειπόμενον; ΚΑΛ. ἀνάγκη. ΣΩ. οὐκοῦν πρὸς πολὺν ὄχλον καὶ δῆμον οὗτοι λέγονται οἱ λόγοι; ΚΑΛ. φημί. ΣΩ. δημηγορία ἄρα τίς ἐστιν ἡ ποιητική. ΚΑΛ. φαίνεται. ΣΩ. οὐκοῦν ῥητορικὴ δημηγορία ἂν εἴη· ἢ οὐ ῥητορεύειν δοκοῦσί σοι οἱ ποιηταὶ ἐν τοῖς θεάτροις; ΚΑΛ. ἔμοιγε. ΣΩ. νῦν ἄρα ἡμεῖς ηὑρήκαμεν ῥητορικήν τινα πρὸς δῆμον τοιοῦτον οἷον παίδων τε ὁμοῦ καὶ γυναικῶν καὶ ἀνδρῶν, καὶ δούλων καὶ ἐλευθέρων, ἣν οὐ πάνυ ἀγάμεθα· κολακικὴν γὰρ αὐτήν φαμεν εἶναι. ΚΑΛ. πάνυ γε. ΣΩ. εἶεν· τί δὲ ἡ πρὸς τὸν Ἀθηναίων δῆμον ῥητορικὴ καὶ τοὺς ἄλλους τοὺς ἐν ταῖς πόλεσιν δήμους τοὺς τῶν ἐλευθέρων ἀνδρῶν, τί ποτε ἡμῖν αὕτη ἐστίν; πότερόν σοι δοκοῦσιν πρὸς τὸ βέλτιστον ἀεὶ λέγειν οἱ ῥήτορες, τούτου στοχαζόμενοι, ὅπως οἱ πολῖται ὡς βέλτιστοι ἔσονται διὰ τοὺς αὑτῶν λόγους, ἢ καὶ οὗτοι πρὸς τὸ χαρίζεσθαι τοῖς πολίταις ὡρμημένοι, καὶ ἕνεκα τοῦ ἰδίου τοῦ αὑτῶν ὀλιγωροῦντες τοῦ κοινοῦ, ὥσπερ παισὶ προσομιλοῦσι τοῖς δήμοις, χαρίζεσθαι αὐτοῖς πειρώμενοι μόνον, εἰ δέ γε βελτίους ἔσονται ἢ χείρους διὰ ταῦτα, οὐδὲν φροντίζουσιν;
SOCRATES: And what about the training of choruses and the poetry of dithyrambs? Does not some such thing appear to you to be of this kind? Or do you think that Cinesias, the son of Meles, cares at all about saying something of such a kind from which the listeners might become better, or rather that he is about to gratify the crowd of spectators? CALLICLES: This is certainly clear, Socrates, at least concerning Cinesias. SOCRATES: And what about his father, Meles? Did he seem to you to play the cithara and sing looking toward what is best? Or did he not look even toward what is most pleasant? For he used to annoy the spectators by his singing. But consider: do you not think that all cithara-playing and the poetry of dithyrambs have been invented for the sake of pleasure? CALLICLES: I do. SOCRATES: And what indeed about this stately and wonderful poetry, that of tragedy, for what is it zealous? Is its endeavor and zeal, as it seems to you, only to gratify the spectators, or also to fight against them, if something is pleasant and gratifying to them but bad, so as not to say this, and if something happens to be unpleasant and beneficial, to say and sing this, whether they enjoy it or not? In which of the two ways do you think the poetry of tragedies is prepared? CALLICLES: This is certainly clear, Socrates, that it is more impelled toward pleasure and gratifying the spectators. SOCRATES: And did we not say just now, Callicles, that such a thing is flattery? CALLICLES: Yes, indeed. SOCRATES: Come then, if one should strip all poetry of its melody, rhythm, and meter, does anything else remain than speech? CALLICLES: Necessarily. SOCRATES: And is not this speech spoken to a large crowd and people? CALLICLES: Yes. SOCRATES: Poetry, then, is a kind of popular speech. CALLICLES: So it appears. SOCRATES: Then it would be a rhetorical popular speech; or do the poets not seem to you to practice rhetoric in the theaters? CALLICLES: They do to me. SOCRATES: Now, then, we have found a certain rhetoric directed to such a people as is composed of children, women, and men, both slaves and free, which we do not altogether admire; for we say it is of a flattering kind. CALLICLES: Yes, indeed. SOCRATES: Very well. And what about the rhetoric directed to the Athenian people and the other peoples in the cities who are composed of free men, what in the world is this to us? Do the rhetoricians seem to you to speak always looking to what is best, aiming at this, that the citizens will be as good as possible through their speeches, or are these too impelled toward gratifying the citizens, neglecting the common good for the sake of their own private interest, associating with the peoples as if they were children, trying only to gratify them, but whether they will be better or worse through these things, caring not at all?
ΚΑΛ. οὐχ ἁπλοῦν ἔτι τοῦτο ἐρωτᾷς· εἰσὶ μὲν γὰρ οἳ κηδόμενοι τῶν πολιτῶν λέγουσιν ἃ λέγουσιν, εἰσὶν δὲ καὶ οἵους σὺ λέγεις. ΣΩ. ἐξαρκεῖ. εἰ γὰρ καὶ τοῦτό ἐστι διπλοῦν, τὸ μὲν ἕτερόν που τούτου κολακεία ἂν εἴη καὶ αἰσχρὰ δημηγορία, τὸ δʼ ἕτερον καλόν, τὸ παρασκευάζειν ὅπως ὡς βέλτισται ἔσονται τῶν πολιτῶν αἱ ψυχαί, καὶ διαμάχεσθαι λέγοντα τὰ βέλτιστα, εἴτε ἡδίω εἴτε ἀηδέστερα ἔσται τοῖς ἀκούουσιν. ἀλλʼ οὐ πώποτε σὺ ταύτην εἶδες τὴν ῥητορικήν· ἢ εἴ τινα ἔχεις τῶν ῥητόρων τοιοῦτον εἰπεῖν, τί οὐχὶ καὶ ἐμοὶ αὐτὸν ἔφρασας τίς ἐστιν; ΚΑΛ. ἀλλὰ μὰ Δία οὐκ ἔχω ἔγωγέ σοι εἰπεῖν τῶν γε νῦν ῥητόρων οὐδένα. ΣΩ. τί δέ; τῶν παλαιῶν ἔχεις τινὰ εἰπεῖν διʼ ὅντινα αἰτίαν ἔχουσιν Ἀθηναῖοι βελτίους γεγονέναι, ἐπειδὴ ἐκεῖνος ἤρξατο δημηγορεῖν, ἐν τῷ πρόσθεν χρόνῳ χείρους ὄντες; ἐγὼ μὲν γὰρ οὐκ οἶδα τίς ἐστιν οὗτος. ΚΑΛ. τί δέ; Θεμιστοκλέα οὐκ ἀκούεις ἄνδρα ἀγαθὸν γεγονότα καὶ Κίμωνα καὶ Μιλτιάδην καὶ Περικλέα τουτονὶ τὸν νεωστὶ τετελευτηκότα, οὗ καὶ σὺ ἀκήκοας; ΣΩ. εἰ ἔστιν γε, ὦ Καλλίκλεις, ἣν πρότερον σὺ ἔλεγες ἀρετήν, ἀληθής,3 τὸ τὰς ἐπιθυμίας ἀποπιμπλάναι καὶ τὰς αὑτοῦ καὶ τὰς τῶν ἄλλων· εἰ δὲ μὴ τοῦτο, ἀλλʼ ὅπερ ἐν τῷ ὑστέρῳ λόγῳ ἠναγκάσθημεν ἡμεῖς ὁμολογεῖν—ὅτι αἳ μὲν τῶν ἐπιθυμιῶν πληρούμεναι βελτίω ποιοῦσι τὸν ἄνθρωπον, ταύτας μὲν ἀποτελεῖν, αἳ δὲ χείρω, μή, τοῦτο δὲ τέχνη τις εἴη—τοιοῦτον ἄνδρα τούτων τινὰ οὐκ ἔχω ἔγωγε πῶς εἴπω. ΚΑΛ. ἀλλʼ ἐὰν ζητῇς καλῶς, εὑρήσεις. ΣΩ. ἴδωμεν δὴ οὑτωσὶ ἀτρέμα σκοπούμενοι εἴ τις τούτων τοιοῦτος γέγονεν· φέρε γάρ, ὁ ἀγαθὸς ἀνὴρ καὶ ἐπὶ τὸ βέλτιστον λέγων, ἃ ἂν λέγῃ ἄλλο τι οὐκ εἰκῇ ἐρεῖ, ἀλλʼ ἀποβλέπων πρός τι; ὥσπερ καὶ οἱ ἄλλοι πάντες δημιουργοὶ4 πρὸς τὸ αὑτῶν ἔργον ἕκαστος οὐκ εἰκῇ ἐκλεγόμενος προσφέρει ἀλλʼ ὅπως ἂν εἶδός τι αὐτῷ σχῇ τοῦτο ὃ ἐργάζεται.
CALLICLES: This question you ask is no longer simple; for there are some who say what they say because they care for the citizens, but there are also such as those you speak of. SOCRATES: That is enough. For if this too is twofold, one of them, I suppose, would be flattery and shameful popular speech, whereas the other is beautiful—preparing so that the souls of the citizens will be as good as possible, and fighting to say what is best, whether it will be more pleasant or more unpleasant to the listeners. But you have never yet seen this rhetoric; or if you can mention any such person among the rhetoricians, why did you not tell me who he is? CALLICLES: But, by Zeus, I have no one to tell you among the current rhetoricians. SOCRATES: Well, what about the ancient ones? Can you mention anyone because of whom the Athenians are said to have become better, after that man began to speak in public, whereas they had been worse in the time before? For I, for my part, do not know who this is. CALLICLES: What? Do you not hear that Themistocles was a good man, and Cimon, and Miltiades, and Pericles here who has recently died, whom you also have heard? SOCRATES: If indeed, Callicles, that which you previously called virtue is true—namely, to satisfy one’s desires, both one’s own and those of others. But if it is not this, but what we were forced to agree upon in the later argument—that we should fulfill those desires which make a man better when satisfied, but not those which make him worse, and that this is a certain craft—I, for my part, do not know how I can say that any of these men was such. CALLICLES: But if you search well, you will find one. SOCRATES: Let us see then, looking at it quietly in this way, if any of these has been such. For come, the good man who speaks looking toward what is best, whatever he says, will he not say it not at random, but looking toward something? Just as all the other craftsmen, each looking toward his own work, does not select and apply at random, but so that the thing he is working on may have a certain form.
- 502ἢ ὅτι μέλλει χαριεῖσθαι
The conjunction ὅτι is interpreted as introducing a noun clause parallel to the ὅπως clause, dependent on the main verb φροντίζειν (or ἡγῇ). While some read it as the indefinite relative pronoun ὅ τι acting as the object of χαριεῖσθαι, treating it as a conjunction best fits the contrast with the preceding clause.
- 502bὅπως τοῦτο μὲν μὴ ἐρεῖ
The clause with ὅπως followed by the future indicative (μὴ ἐρεῖ) depends on the preceding infinitive διαμάχεσθαι ('to fight'), expressing the effort or precautionary goal of the struggle ('to take care not to say this').
- 503cεἰ ἔστιν γε ... ἀληθής
The apodosis (main clause) for the conditional clause εἰ ἔστιν... is omitted. It must be supplied from Callicles' preceding question to mean 'then they were good men.' This implicit main clause stands in contrast with the explicit apodosis of the alternative condition (εἰ δὲ μὴ τοῦτο...): 'I do not know how I can say...'
- 503eὥσπερ καὶ οἱ ἄλλοι πάντες δημιουργοὶ
In the comparative clause introduced by ὥσπερ, the main verb προσφέρει appears alongside the participle ἐκλεγόμενος. This structure parallels the main clause verb ἐρεῖ ('will speak'), illustrating how other craftsmen apply their material not at random, but with a specific goal in view, as explained by the final ὅπως clause.
