- Source
- Platonis Opera, Tomus III: Tetralogia V-VII. Burnet, John, editor. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1903.
- Translation
- AI-generated (gemini-3.5-flash) — machine translation; may contain errors
- Languages
- 日本語 · English · 简体中文 · 한국어
- CTS URN
- urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0059.tlg021.humanitext-grc2:300-301
- Generated
- Humanitext Reader · reader.humanitext.ai · 2026-10-27
Euthydemus and Dionysodorus employ fallacies based on the ambiguity of 'capability of seeing' and 'speaking while silent' against Ctesippus, who retaliates. Afterwards, Dionysodorus argues with Socrates about the 'presence' of beauty and the definition of performing fitting tasks, leading to absurd conclusions.
ΣΩ. πότερον δὲ ὁρῶσιν, ἔφη ὁ Εὐθύδημος, καὶ Σκύθαι τε καὶ οἱ ἄλλοι ἄνθρωποι τὰ δυνατὰ ὁρᾶν1 ἢ τὰ ἀδύνατα; — τὰ δυνατὰ δήπου. — οὐκοῦν καὶ σύ, ἔφη;— κἀγώ. — ὁρᾷς οὖν τὰ ἡμέτερα ἱμάτια; — ναί. — δυνατὰ οὖν ὁρᾶν ἐστὶν ταῦτα. — ὑπερφυῶς, ἔφη ὁ Κτήσιππος.— τί δέ; ἦ δʼ ὅς.— μηδέν. σὺ δὲ ἴσως οὐκ οἴει αὐτὰ ὁρᾶν· οὕτως ἡδὺς εἶ. ἀλλά μοι δοκεῖς, Εὐθύδημε, οὐ καθεύδων ἐπικεκοιμῆσθαι καί, εἰ οἷόν τε λέγοντα μηδὲν λέγειν, καὶ σὺ τοῦτο ποιεῖν. ἦ γὰρ οὐχ οἷόν τʼ, ἔφη ὁ Διονυσόδωρος, σιγῶντα λέγειν;2 — οὐδʼ ὁπωστιοῦν, ἦ δʼ ὃς ὁ Κτήσιππος.— ἆρʼ οὐδὲ λέγοντα σιγᾶν; — ἔτι ἧττον, ἔφη.— ὅταν οὖν λίθους λέγῃς καὶ ξύλα καὶ σιδήρια, οὐ σιγῶντα λέγεις; — οὔκουν εἴ γε ἐγώ, ἔφη, παρέρχομαι ἐν τοῖς χαλκείοις, ἀλλὰ φθεγγόμενα καὶ βοῶντα μέγιστον τὰ σιδήρια λέγεται, ἐάν τις ἅψηται· ὥστε τοῦτο μὲν ὑπὸ σοφίας ἔλαθες οὐδὲν εἰπών. ἀλλʼ ἔτι μοι τὸ ἕτερον ἐπιδείξατον, ὅπως αὖ ἔστιν λέγοντα σιγᾶν. καί μοι ἐδόκει ὑπεραγωνιᾶν ὁ Κτήσιππος διὰ τὰ παιδικά. ὅταν σιγᾷς, ἔφη ὁ Εὐθύδημος, οὐ πάντα σιγᾷς;3 — ἔγωγε, ἦ δʼ ὅς.— οὐκοῦν καὶ τὰ λέγοντα σιγᾷς, εἴπερ τῶν ἁπάντων ἐστὶν. — τί δέ; ἔφη ὁ Κτήσιππος, οὐ σιγᾷ πάντα; — οὐ δήπου, ἔφη ὁ Εὐθύδημος.— ἀλλʼ ἄρα, ὦ βέλτιστε, λέγει τὰ πάντα; — τά γε δήπου λέγοντα. — ἀλλά, ἦ δʼ ὅς, οὐ τοῦτο ἐρωτῶ, ἀλλὰ τὰ πάντα σιγᾷ ἢ λέγει; οὐδέτερα καὶ ἀμφότερα, ἔφη ὑφαρπάσας ὁ Διονυσόδωρος· εὖ γὰρ οἶδα ὅτι τῇ ἀποκρίσει οὐχ ἕξεις ὅτι χρῇ. καὶ ὁ Κτήσιππος, ὥσπερ εἰώθει, μέγα πάνυ ἀνακαγχάσας, ὦ Εὐθύδημε, ἔφη, ὁ ἀδελφός σου ἐξημφοτέρικεν τὸν λόγον, καὶ ἀπόλωλέ τε καὶ ἥττηται. καὶ ὁ Κλεινίας πάνυ ἥσθη καὶ ἐγέλασεν, ὥστε ὁ Κτήσιππος ἐγένετο πλεῖον ἢ δεκαπλάσιος. ὁ δέ μοι δοκεῖ ἅτε πανοῦργος ὤν, ὁ Κτήσιππος, παρʼ αὐτῶν τούτων αὐτὰ ταῦτα παρηκηκόει· οὐ γάρ ἐστιν ἄλλων τοιαύτη σοφία τῶν νῦν ἀνθρώπων. κἀγὼ εἶπον· τί γελᾷς, ὦ Κλεινία, ἐπὶ σπουδαίοις οὕτω πράγμασιν καὶ καλοῖς; σὺ γὰρ ἤδη τι πώποτʼ εἶδες, ὦ Σώκρατες, καλὸν πρᾶγμα; ἔφη ὁ Διονυσόδωρος. ἔγωγε, ἔφην, καὶ πολλά γε, ὦ Διονυσόδωρε.
SOCRATES: ‘But indeed,’ Euthydemus said, ‘do the Scythians and other humans see things that are capable of seeing, or things that are incapable?’ ‘—Things capable, surely.’ ‘—Therefore you also see?’ he said. ‘—I too.’ ‘—Do you see our cloaks?’ ‘—Yes.’ ‘—Are these, then, capable of seeing?’ ‘—Wonderfully so,’ said Ctesippus. ‘—What then do they see?’ he said. ‘—Nothing. But perhaps you don’t think they see; so sweet you are. But you seem to me, O Euthydemus, not sleeping but having fallen asleep, and, if it is possible speaking to say nothing, you also do this.’ ’For indeed is it not possible,’ Dionysodorus said, ‘for a silent person to speak?’ ‘—Not in any way,’ said Ctesippus. ‘—Nor for a speaking person to keep silent?’ ‘—Still less,’ he said. ‘—When then you speak of stones and woods and irons, do you not speak of silent things?’ ‘—Not indeed if I,’ he said, ‘pass by the blacksmiths’ shops, but the irons are said to speak and cry out very loudly if someone touches them; so you have failed to say anything by your wisdom. But show me the other thing, how again it is possible for a speaking person to keep silent.’ And Ctesippus seemed to me to be extremely anxious on account of his beloved. ‘When you are silent,’ said Euthydemus, ‘do you not keep silent about all things?’ ‘—I indeed do,’ he said. ‘—Therefore you also keep silent about the speaking things, if indeed they are among all things.’ ‘—What?’ said Ctesippus, ‘do not all things keep silent?’ ‘—Surely not,’ said Euthydemus. ‘—But then, my good man, do all things speak?’ ‘—The speaking things, surely.’ ‘—But,’ he said, ‘I don’t ask this, but do all things keep silent or speak?’ ’Neither and both,’ said Dionysodorus, snatching the word; ‘for I well know that you will not know what to do with the answer.’ And Ctesippus, as was his custom, laughing out very loud, said, ‘O Euthydemus, your brother has made the argument go both ways, and he is ruined and defeated.’ And Cleinias was very pleased and laughed, so that Ctesippus became ten times larger. But Ctesippus, as it seems to me, being a rogue, had overheard these very things from these very men; for there is no other such wisdom among men of today. And I said: ‘Why do you laugh, O Cleinias, at such serious and beautiful things?’ ‘Have you ever seen any beautiful thing, O Socrates?’ said Dionysodorus. ‘—I indeed have, and many indeed, O Dionysodorus,’ I said.
ΣΩ. ἆρα ἕτερα ὄντα τοῦ καλοῦ, ἔφη, ἢ ταὐτὰ τῷ καλῷ; κἀγὼ ἐν παντὶ ἐγενόμην ὑπὸ ἀπορίας, καὶ ἡγούμην δίκαια πεπονθέναι ὅτι ἔγρυξα, ὅμως δὲ ἕτερα ἔφην αὐτοῦ γε τοῦ καλοῦ· πάρεστιν μέντοι ἑκάστῳ αὐτῶν κάλλος τι. ἐὰν οὖν, ἔφη, παραγένηταί σοι βοῦς, βοῦς εἶ, καὶ ὅτι νῦν ἐγώ σοι πάρειμι, Διονυσόδωρος εἶ; εὐφήμει τοῦτό γε, ἦν δʼ ἐγώ. ἀλλὰ τίνα τρόπον, ἔφη, ἑτέρου ἑτέρῳ παραγενομένου τὸ ἕτερον ἕτερον ἂν εἴη;4 ἆρα τοῦτο, ἔφην ἐγώ, ἀπορεῖς; ἤδη δὲ τοῖν ἀνδροῖν τὴν σοφίαν ἐπεχείρουν μιμεῖσθαι, ἅτε ἐπιθυμῶν αὐτῆς. πῶς γὰρ οὐκ ἀπορῶ, ἔφη, καὶ ἐγὼ καὶ οἱ ἄλλοι ἅπαντες ἄνθρωποι ὃ μὴ ἔστι; τί λέγεις, ἦν δʼ ἐγώ, ὦ Διονυσόδωρε; οὐ τὸ καλὸν καλόν ἐστιν καὶ τὸ αἰσχρὸν αἰσχρόν;— ἐὰν ἔμοιγε, ἔφη, δοκῇ. —οὐκοῦν δοκεῖ;— πάνυ γʼ, ἔφη.—οὐκοῦν καὶ τὸ ταὐτὸν ταὐτὸν καὶ τὸ ἕτερον ἕτερον; οὐ γὰρ δήπου τό γε ἕτερον ταὐτόν, ἀλλʼ ἔγωγε οὐδʼ ἂν παῖδα ᾤμην τοῦτο ἀπορῆσαι, ὡς οὐ τὸ ἕτερον ἕτερόν ἐστιν.5 ἀλλʼ, ὦ Διονυσόδωρε, τοῦτο μὲν ἑκὼν παρῆκας, ἐπεὶ τὰ ἄλλα μοι δοκεῖτε ὥσπερ οἱ δημιουργοὶ οἷς ἕκαστα προσήκει ἀπεργάζεσθαι, καὶ ὑμεῖς τὸ διαλέγεσθαι παγκάλως ἀπεργάζεσθαι. οἶσθα οὖν, ἔφη, ὅτι προσήκει ἑκάστοις τῶν δημιουργῶν; πρῶτον τίνα χαλκεύειν προσήκει, οἶσθα; —ἔγωγε· ὅτι χαλκέα.— τί δέ, κεραμεύειν; —κεραμέα.— τί δέ, σφάττειν τε καὶ ἐκδέρειν καὶ τὰ μικρὰ κρέα κατακόψαντα ἕψειν καὶ ὀπτᾶν; μάγειρον, ἦν δʼ ἐγώ.— οὐκοῦν ἐάν τις, ἔφη, τὰ προσήκοντα πράττῃ, ὀρθῶς πράξει; —μάλιστα.— προσήκει δέ γε, ὡς φῄς, τὸν μάγειρον κατακόπτειν καὶ ἐκδέρειν; ὡμολόγησας ταῦτα ἢ οὔ; —ὡμολόγησα, ἔφην, ἀλλὰ συγγνώμην μοι ἔχε.— δῆλον τοίνυν, ἦ δʼ ὅς, ὅτι ἄν τις σφάξας τὸν μάγειρον καὶ κατακόψας ἑψήσῃ καὶ ὀπτήσῃ, τὰ προσήκοντα ποιήσει· καὶ ἐὰν τὸν χαλκέα τις αὐτὸν χαλκεύῃ καὶ τὸν κεραμέα κεραμεύῃ, καὶ οὗτος τὰ προσήκοντα πράξει. ὦ Πόσειδον, ἦν δʼ ἐγώ, ἤδη κολοφῶνα ἐπιτιθεῖς τῇ σοφίᾳ. ἆρά μοί ποτε αὕτη παραγενήσεται ὥστε μοι οἰκεία γενέσθαι; ἐπιγνοίης ἂν αὐτήν, ὦ Σώκρατες, ἔφη, οἰκείαν γενομένην; ἐὰν σύ γε βούλῃ, ἔφην ἐγώ, δῆλον ὅτι. τί δέ, ἦ δʼ ὅς, τὰ σαυτοῦ οἴει γιγνώσκειν; εἰ μή τι σὺ ἄλλο λέγεις· ἀπὸ σοῦ γὰρ δεῖ ἄρχεσθαι, τελευτᾶν δʼ εἰς Εὐθύδημον τόνδε.
’Are they other than the beautiful,’ he said, ‘or the same as the beautiful?’ And I was in every way in difficulty under my perplexity, and I thought I had suffered justly because I had grunted, but nevertheless I said they were other than the beautiful itself, but nevertheless there is present to each of them some beauty. ‘If then,’ he said, ‘an ox is present to you, are you an ox? And because I am now present to you, are you Dionysodorus?’ ‘Keep quiet about this, at least!’ I said. ‘But in what way,’ he said, ‘when one thing is present to another, would the other be other?’ ’Are you in doubt about this?’ I said. And already I was attempting to imitate the wisdom of the two men, since I desired it. ‘How indeed should I not be in doubt,’ he said, ‘and I and all other humans, about what is not?’ ‘What do you say, O Dionysodorus? Is not the beautiful beautiful, and the ugly ugly?’ ‘—If indeed it seems so to me,’ he said. ‘—And does it not seem so?’ ‘—Very much so,’ he said. ‘—Therefore is not the same same, and the other other? For surely the other is not the same; but I indeed would not have thought even a child would doubt this, that the other is other. But, O Dionysodorus, you have let this pass willingly, since in other things you seem to me, like the craftsmen to whom it belongs to work out each thing, you also work out discussing beautifully.’ ‘Do you know then,’ he said, ‘what belongs to each of the craftsmen? First, to whom does it belong to work in bronze, do you know?’ ‘—I do; to a blacksmith.’ ‘—And what of making pottery?’ ‘—To a potter.’ ‘—And what of slaughtering, skinning, and hacking the small pieces of meat to boil and roast them?’ ’To a cook,’ I said. ‘—Therefore, if someone,’ he said, ‘does what is fitting, will he do rightly?’ ‘—Most certainly.’ ‘—And is it fitting, as you say, for the cook to hack and skin? Did you agree to this or not?’ ‘—I agreed,’ I said, ‘but have mercy on me.’ ‘—It is clear then,’ he said, ‘that if someone slaughters the cook and hacks him, and boils and roasts him, he will do what is fitting; and if someone hammers the blacksmith himself and pots the potter, he also will do what is fitting.’ ’O Poseidon,’ I said, ‘now you put the finishing stroke on your wisdom. Will this ever be present to me so as to become my own?’ ‘Would you recognize it, O Socrates,’ he said, ‘when it has become your own?’ ‘—If you indeed wish it,’ I said, ‘clearly yes.’ ‘—And what?’ he said, ‘do you think you know your own things?’ ‘—Unless you say something else; for one must begin from you, and end in Euthydemus here.’
- 300aδυνατὰ ὁρᾶν
The adjective δυνατά (neuter plural) accompanied by the active infinitive ὁρᾶν. Grammatically, it can mean both 'capable of seeing' (active) and 'capable of being seen / visible' (passive aspect, an extension of the infinitive of purpose/result). Euthydemus first gets Ctesippus' agreement in the passive sense ('things we can see'), and then shifts to the active sense ('capable of seeing') when asking about the cloaks.
- 300bσιγῶντα λέγειν
σιγῶντα can be interpreted either as a masculine singular accusative participle ('a silent person', acting as the subject of the infinitive λέγειν in an accusative-and-infinitive construction: 'for a silent person to speak') or as a neuter plural accusative ('silent things', acting as the direct object of the verb λέγειν). Dionysodorus poses the question in the former sense ('for a silent person to speak'), and when Ctesippus denies it, he shifts to the latter sense ('to speak of silent things') in σιγῶντα λέγεις to create a contradiction.
- 300cπάντα σιγᾷς
A sophism based on the confusion between the transitive and intransitive uses of the verb σιγᾶν (to keep silent / to be silent). In ὅταν σιγᾷς, οὐ πάντα σιγᾷς;, πάντα functions as an accusative of respect or direct object ('do you not keep silent about all things?', transitive). Euthydemus then shifts to the intransitive sense with πάντα as the subject ('do all things keep silent?', where the neuter plural subject takes a singular verb σιγᾷ), leading to the paradoxical conclusion οὐκοῦν καὶ τὰ λέγοντα σιγᾷς ('therefore you keep silent about speaking things').
- 301aἑτέρου ἑτέρῳ παραγενομένου τὸ ἕτερον ἕτερον ἂν εἴη
Accompanied by a genitive absolute (ἑτέρου ἑτέρῳ παραγενομένου), this passage attacks the theory of Forms concerning the 'presence' (παρουσία) of properties. Dionysodorus poses a puzzle: if one different thing (e.g., beauty itself) is present to another different thing (e.g., a beautiful object), how can the latter (τὸ ἕτερον) remain different (from the former, or remain different from what it was)? He exploits this to show an apparent contradiction in the idea of the 'presence' of Forms.
- 301cὡς οὐ τὸ ἕτερον ἕτερόν ἐστιν
A Greek idiom where a redundant negative οὐ is used in a dependent clause introduced by a verb of doubting, denying, or disputing (here ἀπορῆσαι). The meaning is not 'to doubt that the other is not other,' but 'to doubt that the other is other.'
