← Plato

Theaetetus

§184

Deferral of Parmenides and the Soul's Perception via Organs

While showing respect for Parmenides' doctrine of rest, Socrates prioritizes the original inquiry into the nature of knowledge, initiating a discussion that distinguishes the soul as the perceiving agent from bodily organs as mere instruments.

View ▾
View
Translation
Typeface
AI ↗
← PrevNext →
§184

ΣΩ. μέλισσον μὲν καὶ τοὺς ἄλλους, οἳ ἓν ἑστὸς λέγουσι τὸ πᾶν, αἰσχυνόμενος μὴ φορτικῶς σκοπῶμεν, ἧττον αἰσχύνομαι ἢ ἕνα ὄντα Παρμενίδην. Παρμενίδης δέ μοι φαίνεται, τὸ τοῦ Ὁμήρου, αἰδοῖός τέ μοι εἶναι ἅμα δεινός τε. συμπροσέμειξα γὰρ δὴ τῷ ἀνδρὶ πάνυ νέος πάνυ πρεσβύτῃ, καί μοι ἐφάνη βάθος τι ἔχειν παντάπασι γενναῖον. φοβοῦμαι οὖν μὴ οὔτε τὰ λεγόμενα συνιῶμεν,1 τί τε διανοούμενος εἶπε πολὺ πλέον λειπώμεθα, καὶ τὸ μέγιστον, οὗ ἕνεκα ὁ λόγος ὥρμηται, ἐπιστήμης πέρι τί ποτʼ ἐστίν, ἄσκεπτον γένηται ὑπὸ τῶν ἐπεισκωμαζόντων λόγων, εἴ τις αὐτοῖς πείσεται· ἄλλως τε καὶ ὃν νῦν ἐγείρομεν πλήθει ἀμήχανον, εἴτε τις ἐν παρέργῳ σκέψεται, ἀνάξιʼ ἂν πάθοι, εἴτε ἱκανῶς, μηκυνόμενος τὸ τῆς ἐπιστήμης ἀφανιεῖ. δεῖ δὲ οὐδέτερα, ἀλλὰ Θεαίτητον ὧν κυεῖ περὶ ἐπιστήμης2 πειρᾶσθαι ἡμᾶς τῇ μαιευτικῇ τέχνῃ ἀπολῦσαι. ΘΕΟ. ἀλλὰ χρή, εἰ δοκεῖ, οὕτω ποιεῖν. ΣΩ. ἔτι τοίνυν, ὦ Θεαίτητε, τοσόνδε περὶ τῶν εἰρημένων ἐπίσκεψαι. αἴσθησιν γὰρ δὴ ἐπιστήμην ἀπεκρίνω· ἦ γάρ; ΘΕΑΙ. ναί. ΣΩ. εἰ οὖν τίς σε ὧδʼ ἐρωτῴη· τῷ τὰ λευκὰ καὶ μέλανα ὁρᾷ ἄνθρωπος καὶ τῷ τὰ ὀξέα καὶ βαρέα ἀκούει; εἴποις ἂν οἶμαι ὄμμασί τε καὶ ὠσίν. ΘΕΑΙ. ἔγωγε. ΣΩ. τὸ δὲ εὐχερὲς τῶν ὀνομάτων τε καὶ ῥημάτων καὶ μὴ διʼ ἀκριβείας ἐξεταζόμενον τὰ μὲν πολλὰ οὐκ ἀγεννές, ἀλλὰ μᾶλλον τὸ τούτου ἐναντίον ἀνελεύθερον, ἔστι δὲ ὅτε ἀναγκαῖον, οἷον καὶ νῦν ἀνάγκη ἐπιλαβέσθαι τῆς ἀποκρίσεως ἣν ἀποκρίνῃ, ᾗ οὐκ ὀρθή. σκόπει γάρ· ἀπόκρισις ποτέρα ὀρθοτέρα, ᾧ ὁρῶμεν3 τοῦτο εἶναι ὀφθαλμούς, ἢ διʼ οὗ ὁρῶμεν, καὶ ᾧ ἀκούομεν ὦτα, ἢ διʼ οὗ ἀκούομεν; ΘΕΑΙ. διʼ ὧν ἕκαστα αἰσθανόμεθα, ἔμοιγε δοκεῖ, ὦ Σώκρατες, μᾶλλον ἢ οἷς. ΣΩ. δεινὸν γάρ που, ὦ παῖ, εἰ πολλαί τινες ἐν ἡμῖν ὥσπερ ἐν δουρείοις ἵπποις αἰσθήσεις ἐγκάθηνται, ἀλλὰ μὴ εἰς μίαν τινὰ ἰδέαν, εἴτε ψυχὴν εἴτε ὅτι δεῖ καλεῖν, πάντα ταῦτα συντείνει, ᾗ διὰ τούτων οἷον ὀργάνων αἰσθανόμεθα4 ὅσα αἰσθητά. ΘΕΑΙ. ἀλλά μοι δοκεῖ οὕτω μᾶλλον ἢ ἐκείνως. ΣΩ. τοῦδέ τοι ἕνεκα αὐτά σοι διακριβοῦμαι, εἴ τινι ἡμῶν αὐτῶν τῷ αὐτῷ διὰ μὲν ὀφθαλμῶν ἐφικνούμεθα λευκῶν τε καὶ μελάνων, διὰ δὲ τῶν ἄλλων ἑτέρων αὖ τινῶν· καὶ ἕξεις ἐρωτώμενος πάντα τὰ τοιαῦτα εἰς τὸ σῶμα ἀναφέρειν; ἴσως δὲ βέλτιον σὲ λέγειν αὐτὰ ἀποκρινόμενον μᾶλλον ἢ ἐμὲ ὑπὲρ σοῦ πολυπραγμονεῖν. καί μοι λέγε· θερμὰ καὶ σκληρὰ καὶ κοῦφα καὶ γλυκέα διʼ ὧν αἰσθάνῃ, ἆρα οὐ τοῦ σώματος ἕκαστα τίθης; ἢ ἄλλου τινός; ΘΕΑΙ. οὐδενὸς ἄλλου.

​SOCRATES: I have a certain hesitation, lest we examine Melissus and the others who say the whole is one and at rest in a crude manner, but I feel this less than toward Parmenides, who is one. For Parmenides appears to me, in the words of Homer, to be “both venerable and awesome.” For indeed I met the man when I was very young and he was very old, and he seemed to me to possess a depth that was altogether noble. I fear, then, lest we might not understand what is said, and still more fail to comprehend what he had in mind when he spoke, and, most important of all, that the question for the sake of which this discussion was started—about what knowledge is—might become unexamined because of the discussions breaking in on us, if one is to listen to them. Especially since the discussion we are now raising is of an unmanageable size; if one is to examine it as a side issue, it would suffer an unworthy treatment, and if sufficiently, by being prolonged it will make the subject of knowledge disappear. But we must do neither, but rather we must try to deliver Theaetetus by our obstetric art from the things he is pregnant with concerning knowledge. THEODORUS: Indeed we must, if you think so, do this. SOCRATES: Then consider this further point, Theaetetus, concerning what has been said. For you answered that perception is knowledge, did you not? THEAETETUS: Yes. SOCRATES: If, then, someone should ask you this: “By what does a human being see white and black things, and by what does he hear high and low sounds?” You would say, I think, “With eyes and ears.” THEAETETUS: I would. SOCRATES: A casual use of names and verbs, without examining them with precision, is for the most part not ungenerous, but rather its opposite is illiberal, yet sometimes it is necessary, just as now it is necessary to take hold of your answer, in that it is not correct. For consider: which answer is more correct, that eyes are that by which we see, or that through which we see; and ears that by which we hear, or that through which we hear? THEAETETUS: Through which we perceive each of them, it seems to me, Socrates, rather than by which. SOCRATES: Yes, for it would be strange, my boy, if many perceptions were seated in us as if in wooden horses, and did not all tend together toward some one idea, whether soul or whatever one ought to call it, by which, through these as instruments, we perceive all perceptible things. THEAETETUS: Indeed, it seems to me in this way rather than in that. SOCRATES: It is for this very reason that I am precise with you, to see whether by some same part of ourselves we reach white and black things through the eyes, and other things again through other organs; and will you be able, when asked, to refer all such things to the body? But perhaps it is better that you yourself say it in answering, rather than that I busy myself on your behalf. Tell me, then: do you not place all the things through which you perceive hot, hard, light, and sweet as belonging to the body? Or to something else? THEAETETUS: To nothing else.

Syntax notes4 items
  1. 184aφοβοῦμαι οὖν μὴ οὔτε τὰ λεγόμενα συνιῶμεν

    Syntactic structure of the μή clause governed by the verb of fearing φοβοῦμαι. The subjunctives συνιῶμεν (1st pers. pl. pres.), λειπώμεθα (1st pers. pl. pres.), and γένηται (3rd pers. sg. aor.) are coordinated by οὔτε... τε... καί... This correlative structure lists cumulative objects of fear: "lest we neither understand... and fail to comprehend... and...".

  2. 184bὧν κυεῖ περὶ ἐπιστήμης

    The relative pronoun ὧν is attracted to the genitive case of its omitted antecedent τούτων, standing for τούτων ἃ κυεῖ ("from those things which he is pregnant with concerning knowledge"). Grammatically, the verb κυέω would take an accusative object.

  3. 184cᾧ ὁρῶμεν... ἢ διʼ οὗ ὁρῶμεν

    A deliberate contrast between the dative of instrument ᾧ ("by which") and the prepositional phrase διʼ οὗ ("through which") denoting agency or medium. Socrates uses this grammatical distinction to clarify that the eyes are not the active subjects of perception, but rather the media or "instruments" through which the true percipient (the soul) perceives.

  4. 184dᾗ διὰ τούτων οἷον ὀργάνων αἰσθανόμεθα

    The relative word ᾗ (either a relative adverb or the feminine dative singular of the relative pronoun ὅς) refers back to the antecedent μίαν τινὰ ἰδέαν (some one idea / soul). It functions to mean "in/by which, using these as instruments, we perceive," indicating the mental locus or agency of unified perception.

Translated by Gemini 3.5 Flash (published 2026-05-22)urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0059.tlg006.humanitext-grc2:184